Understanding the TTL connection

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

You're welcome....

Since you mention hot-shoes.... I should also add that there are two types of TTL -- they both do the same thing, the difference is in the way they are connected.

1. Wired TTL requires a hot shoe on the camera (that presumably supports TTL), an electronic connection in the housing known as a "bulkhead connection, a strobe compatible with the particular flavor of TTL on the camera (they vary by maker) OR a TTL adapter (a little electronics box) that can translate between the camera and strobe, and a proper cable which has wires inside and therefore needs to be sealed with o-rings on all ends. This is the "traditional" way of doing this and is still very common. You need to insure that all the pieces mentioned above exist for your camera and strobe you plan on getting.

2. Optical TTL or "slave" TTL -- this is much simpler and works just as well.... A fiber-optic cable connects between your housing and the strobe. No hot shoe or any other electrical connection is needed. The external strobe is fired by the internal built-in flash in your camera much like a slave, but smarter. Assuming your camera supports TTL with this internal flash (on land, even) and the strobe you get also supports this mode of TTL, what happens is that the external strobe will mimic the duration of fire from the internal strobe and you will get a good exposure. This is a newer method and is gaining popularity even with dSLRs and pros because the connection method is much simpler, does not involve electricity between the camera and strobe, and the fiber-optic cables do not need to be sealed on both ends thereby eliminating several possible flood points. This is what I use with my E-PL2 and twin Sea & Sea YS-110a strobes and within the limits of TTL in general (see what I wrote above), I get very good exposures pretty much all the time.

Bottom line, you need to know what your camera supports and if its #2, I would go with that for simplicity's sake.... #2 can also be quite less expensive if you can't find a strobe directly compatible with your camera and you need to get one of those TTL adapters I mentioned in #1. The YS-110a supports both connection methods. The less expensive and a tiny bit less powerful YS-01 supports only fiber-optic TTL. Both are excellent choices. Inon also makes excellent strobes. The 2000 is optical-only and quite good.
 
How could yours be only the first route? If you have a hot shoe, it doesn't mean you are stuck using it. You will be forced to use wired TTL only if your housing is not transparent in color and has no window for the internal flash to shine through. Otherwise, implementing optical TTL involves only attaching a fiber optic cable to the front of your housing where the internal flash resides via velcro.

wired TTL does offer a few advantages though, one is super-macro, which on my camera disables the internal flash, even in slave mode. I have to use WA wet lens, which focuses much closer, to get around that.
 
You are right. It looked like the entire flash of the camera was obscured by the Inon lens mount but there is a very small rubber grommet with a hole in it that you can slide the optical cable into.
 
DoNot--please clarify:

My Oly P&S does not allow me to control shutter speed or aperature, but uses TTL with my strobe. So, in the case of a wide angle full reef shot with blue water in about 1/3 to 1/4 of the photo (similar to your crow's nest example) are you suggesting the strobe be set to manual, probably full power, to get the reef to light up in the shot?
 
DoNot--please clarify:

My Oly P&S does not allow me to control shutter speed or aperature, but uses TTL with my strobe. So, in the case of a wide angle full reef shot with blue water in about 1/3 to 1/4 of the photo (similar to your crow's nest example) are you suggesting the strobe be set to manual, probably full power, to get the reef to light up in the shot?

Generally speaking... (an obvious statement) increasing the power of the strobe will cause more light to fall on objects close enough for the strobe to hit........ what your camera will do when that happens, I cannot answer..... I had a similar setup a while back... Canon SD500 (no manual control, like yours) and I could never get a decent exposure with strobes on manual.... it seemed like whatever I did, the camera would try to compensate for it and the results were sub-optimal..... I then went to a Canon S95, which does have full manual and things improved dramatically...... I then got tired of the P&S small sensors (not good for making big prints) and went to the PL-2 because I could not afford to house my SLRs (Canon 5D2 and 7D)...... Happy so far.....

IDK of anyone that gets consistent results underwater with an auto-only camera.... you may want to consider an upgrade... If you don't want to go as far as the 4/3 sensor E-PLx line, Olympus makes some nice P&S cameras that DO offer full manual. So does Canon -- the S-95 and G-11 are excellent.
 

Back
Top Bottom