The problem with just looking at the spaghetti plot for a storm like this is that once they initialize with a closed circulation, they will continue to show a track for whatever the lowest pressure is even if the storm has dissipated to next to nothing. I tend to look more at the MSLP plots from the actual model runs from models like the GFS that I linked above or the NAM to see whether they actually develop much intensity. I don't rely on my interpretation of them to make a decision though. I am just looking at them to understand what is being discussed in the NHC's forecast discussion. They will often reference one model or set of models that is different than the others...in this case, the GFS has been more aggressive at developing a large storm once in the Caribbean than most of the other models. So I look at that set of models to see if there are possibilities other than what is being discussed in the official NHC forecast. In this case, the GFS had been predicting a strong storm developing from the remnants of TD#9 starting on about the 26th or 27th around Roatan, then heading north and strengthening as it went west of the Caymans before heading to Florida. In the most recent run, it starts to show something right by Roatan, but then moves it inland over Central America and dissipates it. Only time and further runs will tell if that is a consistent solution that is believable or not, but at least it is in better agreement with most of the other models that don't do much to develop anything significant once it comes into the Caribbean.
I should also add a note that these are models working at the edge of their forecast skill when we are talking 5-7 days out. Especially for intensity, they are not very good for the most part beyond about 3 days. So take anything you see with a grain of salt. However, generally if a storm is going to develop into a strong to moderate storm, you will usually see a spread of models around where it ends up...with some showing stronger development and some showing less development. This year especially, the long range GFS solutions have been overly aggressive in showing development that in most cases hasn't come to pass. So if it is backing off of developing the storm and other models aren't showing much development, I start feeling maybe just ever so slightly better that maybe nothing much will come of it. But I won't stop watching to see if anything changes, as the models were all pretty badly wrong about how Wilma developed in a very similar scenario.