I don't like the price of the LV batteries and have not used their rechargeables and the little battery tray looks fragile to me but on the other hand...I had a sola light and sold it. It frequently wanted recharging at the same time I wanted to get another dive or two out of it. And, if there happened to be no power source around when the battery ran down, then the light was simply unusable. The Sola also has to be charged every couple weeks even when in "storage" to avoid the light dying completely and requiring special steps to revive.
Many of the people I know who use them for photo lights buy two so they can keep diving while one is charging. I now try to avoid "built in" rechargeable batteries because I prefer to know that if need be, I can swap out a discharged battery for a good one and/or have a battery charging somewhere while still using the product with a a good battery in it. If the product will be unused for several months, I can can remove the batttery and not have to worry about or at least just have a battery that needs to be topped off sometimes.
Just me, but I would be hesitant to buy a dive computer with a non-user replaceable rechargeable battery, so for any product it is more of a marketing decision than a design defect..
I also question whether a battery exists that would fit in a dive light or computer and that would be good for 500 dives (and presumably several months time) without needing a recharge. I am unaware of any other dive computer with a battery such as that and the Sola light that is cited as an example of superior design doesn't get through more than a few dives before dying...Criticizing a product for not using something that does not exist seems unfair.