Can anyone explain why the diving skills of instructors is being discussed in relation to an incident that has absolutely nothing to do with diver skill?
This sounds like a death that shouldn't happened.
- Thread starter Bazzer69
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
Maverick17
Contributor
OP speculated "shouldn't have happened" > group didn't know why he would say that and some flamed him for speculating > OP said he was a noob > (in an astounding turnabout) group then speculated that his reasoning for "shouldn't have happened" was his esteemed outlook on instructors as a noob and deceased's status as an instructor > group then began discussing instructors who suck.
descent
Contributor
It's simple. Try to follow this logic from Socrates.
Squeezing marine fauna is a party foul. Only an idiot would do it, and everyone knows that idiots deserve to die. (This is Darwinian natural selection)
Someone in Vietnam squoze the ink out of an octopus. He was an instructor.
Therefore, all instructors are ink-squeezing idiots who deserve to ... wait a minute.
Squeezing marine fauna is a party foul. Only an idiot would do it, and everyone knows that idiots deserve to die. (This is Darwinian natural selection)
Someone in Vietnam squoze the ink out of an octopus. He was an instructor.
Therefore, all instructors are ink-squeezing idiots who deserve to ... wait a minute.
Similar threads
