Here's a link:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/national/20bigcat.html
[Addited] Funny, I googled "lion loose california" and came up with the New York Times article, and the above link. However, if you click on the link or copy it into the address bar, you get a page that say's you must be a subscriber. Sorry.
JustAddWater:
This is dedicated to those opposed to zoos.
What makes you think this had anything to do with zoos? Seems to me if a zoo wanted to get rid of a lion, there are plenty of others that would take it, or they would euthanize it.
The article implies that the lion might have come from an 'animal sanctuary' that was shut down for poor conditions. Pretty ironic, if you ask me...' I thought 'animal sanctuaries' were typically places that took in mistreated or unwanted animals, kind of like a foster home, usually run by animal activists who want to give mistreated animals a better life.
If this lion exists, my bet is some idiot had the lion as an illegal pet, and 'set it free' when it got bigger than he could handle. That seems to happen a lot with all kinds of critters.
Until the lion and it's source is found, I suggest you not use this incident to support a personal bias.
Here's another link for you:
http://10tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=1842659&nav=LUERMriT