thinking of adding a DSLR? I was...

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

So then.......what strobe are you using and what strobe are you looking at?
 
I'm using the Inon 220s at the moment and I love it.

Not sure if I will add another one - no, I don't care that it has been discontinued! - or if I will look at other options. At this time there will be no new toys for a while :(
 
fpoole:
Very nice report Alcina, enjoy reading it

It's nice as it give a good easy prospective to it other than the tech stuff. Enjoyed the photos and all look good...

So, just something wandering (wondering) minds wanna know.

- did you consider the L&M housing?
- would you have, no questions in you mind, gone with an oly 7070 or equivalent?
- is shooting through the viewfinder compared to the LCD a PITA?
- you mention "Other Options" regards to camera makers, Nikon comes immediately to mind, with what were you comparing? D50? D70's or the new D200 (wasn't out yet?). apologies as I forget the comparable models so I might be out of the levels here.

The reason I ask as I have been, and will continue for a while yet between a DSLR and the simple Oly 7070 in a decent housing setup.. Is going to the DSLR that much more different that it would be best to shoot for the DSLR or are they pretty close in photo quality..

thanx much... good report eh??

My take on dSLR,
1) L&M housing, ROC controls seem very nice but had lots of problem in the past. Just when it seems that they have their act together, they seem to move away from dSLR market and concentrate on video. Housing wise, there are so many choices and each has its own weakness and strong point but in general, I would say that Seacam and Subal/Sealux have the advantage with magnifying viewfinder which is very helpful. Nexus wide angle port is just about the most compact and its housing is a bit more compact than Subal generally. Recently Nexus starts to support Canon as well but only their high end models. Sea and Sea is a hit or miss, good 350D housing but not so great d70 housing. Ikelite is probably the best value more money, a bit bigger, the only housing with eTTL and iTTL capability but port system may be a let down for some people but they are working on the problem. I am not familiar wih Aquatica product but heard a lot of good things about them and they offer one of the most affordable aluminum housing around.

2) Going Oly 7070 vs dSLR, depending on what you want to do, there are already plenty of discussion about megapixels, not all are equal. I still believe that dSLR sensor is still superior to PnS in general. The lens quality is a huge different and AF system is much superior. For extreme macro in low light situation, I don't think any PnS will come close to dSLR in this regard. There are shots that I don't think I could ever get with PnS that I manage to achieve with my dSLR. However PnS can definitely give an excellent result as well.

3) Shooting through LCD vs viewfinder, I was worry about that initially when I switched from C5050 to Nikon D70 also but it really was not an issue. I find that you get much sharper image via viewfinder. LCD monitor resolution is just not good enough to judge focus especially for extreme macro shot. If your eye sight is ok (or even not, I use prescription lenses on my mask) I think you will have no difficult with viewfinder and if you can afford the magnifying viewfinder then you definitely will not miss the LCD.

4) Camera choice, I would stick with either Canon or Nikon for UW photography. Fuji made a mistake with S3 and Olympus does not quite yet have all the neccessary lenses and accessories to make them as competitive. Their lenses are so expensive that in the end , they are not much cheaper than Nikon or Canon. You can debate all day long about Canon vs Nikon. I went with Nikon and Alcina went with Canon and I think neither of us regrets our choices!
 
2) Going Oly 7070 vs dSLR, depending on what you want to do, there are already plenty of discussion about megapixels, not all are equal. I still believe that dSLR sensor is still superior to PnS in general. The lens quality is a huge different and AF system is much superior. For extreme macro in low light situation, I don't think any PnS will come close to dSLR in this regard. There are shots that I don't think I could ever get with PnS that I manage to achieve with my dSLR. However PnS can definitely give an excellent result as well.

Kewl, thanx much...
I guess the leap should be made if the $$ are within reach..
The reasons you mention, each by it'self might not make a "Big" difference, but when combined then, they do...
I take a lot of photos using the natural light (see attached), so the DSLR would be a great benefit..

Thanx much...
Appreciate it.. now, as everyone else in UW Photog world, which one... heheh.. which one of everything, camera, housing strobes ports, lens... geeesh.. :D
 
Very interesting post... I've been shooting underwater for about 10 years now, and started with (and still occasionally use) my old Nikonos V. No matter how good digital has gotten, the subtelties and nuances you get with film doing macro with extension tubes or with a 15mm wide angle can't be beat. Of course the pros of digital far outweigh the cons.

I decided several years ago to switch to video and purchased a Sony PC110 with a Light & Motion housing. The housing is very compact compared to other housings that were on the market at the time, but I had so many problems with malfunctioning lights, batteries, controls, etc. that I spent half my time underwater fiddling with the housing. I also found that, although I did get a good amount of great raw footage, I don't have the patience nor the desire to spend hours editing video footage, putting music to it, titles, etc. So the PC110 and housing are tucked away in storage and I didnt even take them on my last trip...

I did manage to pick up a Nikon Coolpix 5600 and the new Nikon WP-CP3 underwater housing... For a little point and shoot that fits in the palm of my hand, this system worked suprisingly well on a recent dive trip. It was easy to switch modes underwater, and I was able to get good wide angle shots and macro on the same dive. Of course, the built in flash doesn't illuminate anything beyond a few inches, the shutter lag is incredibly long, etc. Still, for an investment of around $500, this is a great little back-up and I'd take it when there's a chance I'd get in the water whereas I'd only lug my other photo gear on liveaboard trips.

So I finally broke down and purchased an Ikelite housing for my Digital Rebel 300D, and a dome port for my Canon 17-35 USM. I also picked up the Canon 60mm with a flat port, and have my eye on a barely used Sigma 15mm FE which will complete the system. I went back and forth between the 100mm and the 60mm lenses before finally deciding on the 60mm, and based on your comments, and the images you shot with the 60mm, I think I made the right decision. I think the 17-35 2.8 will be a good general purpose lens, and several pros I know used that lens almost exclusively on trips I've been on. It seems like a lot of people have now migrated to the 15mm FE, and given that I tend to spend a lot of time photographing sharks, I think that will be a good addition.

I went with Ikelite for a number of reasons... 1) the company has a great service track record and a lot of people have given it very high marks, 2) the housings seem to be great value for the money and cost a lot less than other housings, 3) I do like the clear housings because I'd rather see the start of a flood rather than trust a moisture alarm, and 4) I like the eTTL2 feature with the new DS125 strobes.

I did pick up one DS125 and I'm guessing I'll buy another before my next trip in June.

My first impressions of the housing (not having dove with it yet) are generally good. The packaging was great (unlike the comments you made with respect to the Subal housing and ports). Instructions were pretty good, and everything was clean and well-protected. Yes, the ports came with neoprene covers, so I guess I'm going to return the extras I purchased. Installation of the zoom clamp and the focusing sleeve on the 17-35 was a PITA. I had to shim the sleeve, the adhesive on the shims was almost useless, and the gear sleeve won't fit over the lens from the front. The control to operate the on/off camera switch isn't well designed, and while it's easy to turn the camera off, turning it back on is very difficult. The strobe arms are simple to attach to the camera tray, but the ball arms don't lock down well enough to hold the weight of the strobe. I suspect this will be much less of a problem underwater though.

I'm dying to get in the water and try everything out... I think I made some good choices, and you can't beat the price... The housing, two ports, the strobe, the 60mm lens, ball arms, chargers, etc. cost about the same as many housings alone.

Anyway - I enjoyed your post given that you went through a lot of the same thought processes I just did.
 

Back
Top Bottom