Scuba Do
Contributor
TxHockeyGuy:I think you should understand that a significant percentage of persons in jail are not there for any sort of theft or violent offense. In fact in Texas just under 60% of all people in jail or on probation are there for a non-violent offense.
Here's an example of just how easily this can happen. Lets say you end up losing your job and because of this you can't afford to renew your drivers license. So now you are driving on an expired license and you get pulled over for a headlight that is out. In Texas you have just committed a class A misdemeanor (one step down from a felony) and will be fined between $100 and $500 plus will have to serve a minimum of 3 days in jail and possibly up to 6 months. This doesn't even include lawyer costs, court costs, and the DPS administrative fees which can easily add up to thousands of dollars. What is worse is with that class A on your record finding suitable employment may be very difficult. Even worse is if you get on probation and you can't afford to pay off these fines your probation will be revoked and you will be sent to jail for that 6 months.
It is a horribly vicious cycle started by politicians who want to appear to be tough on crime and end up piling the fines on these "criminals" to help fund their special project of the moment. We need to stop trying to fine to death those who commit petty offenses and start working on the real criminals. Unfortunately anyone trying to correct this situation and help people get out of this cycle is seen as being soft on crime and if they are a politician they would be committing political suicide.
Personally I think training someone with a skill that allows them to be a productive member of society will cost less than letting them keep coming back into the revolving door we call our criminal justice system. I am all in favor of getting people out of jail where they cost tax payers money and back into society where they contribute in the form of taxes. It costs (in Texas) $22,000 to house a single inmate for a year. So even if it cost $10,000 to train someone if we managed to keep them from coming back for a single 6 month period it would save money, plus whatever money they end up contributing from taxes.
I'm all for it.
At the risk of becoming a pariah on SB, that is such a crock (and I have calmed down considerably from my initial reaction). The jails of Texas, or any oher jurisdiction in the United States, is not peopled with individuals who have been law-abiding for a lifetime and merely drove one time on a suspended license. Even if your characterization of the law is correct (what are the Code citations?), for an otherwise law abiding person, there will be NO active jail time. Oh, and by the way, that law is on the books, not to fund pet projects of politicians, but to protect YOU from people who should not be driving (you may disagree with the best way to do that, but that is the reason). While there are certainly numerous people in jail for non-violent crimes, your example is wrong and trivilaizes the entire sytem. Embezzlement, perjury, and fraud are all non-violent crimes. (While we are in Texas, those Enron folks engaged in non-violent crimes). I really do not think those crimes are on the books to pump up pet projects. I have a lot more to say about this, but I will spare everyone. Now can we get back to the purpose of this forum - talking about scuba diving!