PurduEE:
Regardless, you're passing off your particular bias against Pelagic computers as fact, when it's your opinion.
No bias whatsoever. Pelagic makes great computers: I have used an Aeris for many years and never had any problem with it. In my
opinion the Pelagic computers are superior to Suunto, Uwatec and many other brands when it comes to ease-of-use, which is an important criteria when selecting a computer.
I did not elaborate on my statement because it has been discussed several times already. However, for your benefit I will list the facts:
-
FACT The Spencer/Haldane (S/H)algorithm (used in all Pelagics) was developed for diving up to 27m.
-
FACT The S/H algorithm cannot be used for reversed diving profiles.
-
FACT Pelagics use the S/H algorithm for dives up to 27m and use Navy tables for diving beyond that.
-
FACT Most recreational divers do not fit the profile of a Navy diver.
-
FACT Pelagics only measure dissolved gas in your tissues and do not account for free gas.
-
FACT Many studies (e.g. by Wiencke, DAN and Uwatec) have shown that free gas ("microbubbles") becomes a very important factor in multiday repetitive diving.
-
FACT In their recent computer test Diver magazine concluded that the Pelagic computer (an Oceanic in this case) was the only one in 10 models that was not suited for the multiday repetitive diving that they were doing.
-
FACT Rodale's
freedom vs. risk charts show a dramatic difference in NDL's when comparing Pelagics with almost any other brand.
-
FACT Suunto, Uwatec, Mares and other computer manufacturers all advise to get computers that measure free gas for multiday repetitive diving.
So based on these
facts I am of the
opinion that the Pelagic's are not suited for multiday repetitive diving.