packrat12
Contributor
Lines are great but.... Strobes are great but.... Compass is great but.... Depth/layout is great but... Progressive is great but...
The main point John makes is that there are short comings to every method of navigation in a wreck. Lines get cut, Strobes/lights fail, compass can have significant error, depth/layout is can be remembered wrong etc. Dependence on any one of these methods can be fatal, including a line. It is combining the use of some or all of the methods that John does stress. Blindly following a line is a recipe for disaster (as with any other method). Yes if I get a line failure it is like I never had a line, but if I am using other methods of navigation, the line failure may become unimportant. I know what depths to expect, what headings, which side of the wreck I am on due to the lines of the wreck, the silty area is where I have been, the flashing of a strobe is my exit....
I had the pleasure of taking John's Advanced Wreck course twice because of weather on the last day my first attempt, along with my Trimix training. He is a consistent and safety minded diver. I would honestly be more scared of an instructor that says "lines are the only way". We practiced several methods and my favorite, tactile through the wheelhouse. A great anecdote he used was where a diver said he got 250' into the Andrea Doria. How did the diver know this, because he had 250' of line. Did not know a single thing the wreck other than he got 250' in. I now look at wrecks by the room function. I plan on what room is coming up next. I try to get maps, deck plans etc. This is due to Johns training.
On all of my serious wreck dives, I use headings, depth, strobes, levels up or down and yes a line! And I have been in silt outs where the strobe was a comforting marker of our exit!
The main point John makes is that there are short comings to every method of navigation in a wreck. Lines get cut, Strobes/lights fail, compass can have significant error, depth/layout is can be remembered wrong etc. Dependence on any one of these methods can be fatal, including a line. It is combining the use of some or all of the methods that John does stress. Blindly following a line is a recipe for disaster (as with any other method). Yes if I get a line failure it is like I never had a line, but if I am using other methods of navigation, the line failure may become unimportant. I know what depths to expect, what headings, which side of the wreck I am on due to the lines of the wreck, the silty area is where I have been, the flashing of a strobe is my exit....
I had the pleasure of taking John's Advanced Wreck course twice because of weather on the last day my first attempt, along with my Trimix training. He is a consistent and safety minded diver. I would honestly be more scared of an instructor that says "lines are the only way". We practiced several methods and my favorite, tactile through the wheelhouse. A great anecdote he used was where a diver said he got 250' into the Andrea Doria. How did the diver know this, because he had 250' of line. Did not know a single thing the wreck other than he got 250' in. I now look at wrecks by the room function. I plan on what room is coming up next. I try to get maps, deck plans etc. This is due to Johns training.
On all of my serious wreck dives, I use headings, depth, strobes, levels up or down and yes a line! And I have been in silt outs where the strobe was a comforting marker of our exit!