TrimixToo
Contributor
Thanks Trimix. It was actually the details of the chamfer which retains the o-ring (similar to the SAE ports which are the standard for the LP and HP fittings). I will do a straight counterbore which is a relatively easy to design and to dimension - I use that lots for hydraulic designs. Our cylinders here are all metric and so are my spare valves.
Nothing wrong with a straight counterbore in my book (or in Parker's, come to that, with the right dimensions). It's certainly easier to measure the step than it is to measure tool travel (unless you have a DRO or dial indicator on that axis) or an angled bore. It hadn't quite dawned on me yet that there were tanks with metric threads, but of course there are. I actually used to know that, I think. Guess I should have had more coffee this morning. Or something. My money is still (well...again...) on 6H as the class of fit. It's closest to 2B, which is the CoF for 3/4” x 14 NPSM tank threads, IIRC. But Machinery's Handbook is downstairs in the shop and this conversation already reveals how good my memory is, so a quick lookup is probably in order before you make chips.
Happy fabricating and Merry Christmas!