SoCal Marine Protected Areas to be created

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

drbill

The Lorax for the Kelp Forest
Scuba Legend
Rest in Peace
Messages
22,824
Reaction score
6,067
Location
Santa Catalina Island, CA
# of dives
2500 - 4999
Here is one of my recent columns on the process to select areas to be designated as Marine Protected Areas under the State of California's Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA):

Dive Dry with Dr. Bill
#304: SoCal and Catalina MPA's, Part I


As regular readers of this column know, my son Kevin recently became a certified SCUBA diver. It has been a joy to do a few dives with him here in Catalina waters. This past weekend he called to let me know he was boarding a private boat in Newport Beach and heading out to Catalina for a weekend of "bug" hunting. No, he wasn't looking for flies or grasshoppers... it was the opening weekend of lobster season in California, and he was planning to catch a few. Previously he's dived off the mainland hunting for fish.

More than three decades ago, I made a decision to stop all personal take of marine life as well as land-based hunting which I used to do for food and ecological control. Based on this, am I critical of my son's choice to hunt? No, not as long as he takes legally and eats his catch (or shares it with me). In this day and age when most people get their food sanitarily packaged in plastic or cans from the grocery store shelf, I think it is a good thing for people to partake of food they have actually captured, dressed and prepared. Most in our country are too far removed from their prey, and too unaware of the food webs they are immersed in.

To get philosophical on that point for a moment, I've traveled in a number of so called "under developed" countries across the globe primarily to SCUBA dive. I've noticed that people in their cities tend to be much less happy and secure than their fellow citizens who remain in the rural areas. I've attributed this to the fact that those in the cities are isolated from most of their support systems. They work at jobs to obtain money to buy the necessities of life. They live in densely populated areas where individuals often become anonymous due to the lack of family ties. Sound familiar? Fortunately, not so much here on the island.

Those in the less populated areas live close to their sustaining resources. If they are hungry, they can fish, hunt or gather food from the surrounding area. They usually have chickens, pigs or cattle to provide food as well. If they are lonely, they have the social support of their families and the village. Sound familiar? Just consider the difference between living in Avalon and living in the midst of the monster, Lost Angeles-Diego. One of the reasons I stayed here after my first year of teaching was that if the dreaded atomic blast ever occurred, I'd know where to find food. That remains a consideration to this day, especially as I hear the news about the troubled state of our economic system.

Where am I going with this? Whether you love the ocean as a place to harvest your food, or as a place to enjoy the wonders of nature in a non-take fashion, you are connected to the marine environments that surround our island. They may sustain your soul, or your stomach, or both. If you have children, or (gulp) grandchildren, you hope that they will be able to enjoy that same sense of connection that you and I do in future years.

Over the decades that I've lived on Catalina, I've listened to the tales of many "old timers" (a status I'm all-too-rapidly approaching) about the way things were in their younger years. I've read the works of Charles F. Holder, Zane Grey and others about the incredible fishing in our waters back in the late 1800's and early 1900's. Assuming there is only a tiny element of the typical "fish story" to these remembrances, our waters were amazingly plentiful a century or two ago. Few of us have personally experienced that "baseline" from which to judge the health of our marine ecosystems. Our "baselines" started much later, after decades and more of commercial and recreational take, not to mention pollution and other impacts. Few, if any, of us know how abundant truly healthy fish and invertebrate populations would be.

Whether you are an angler or an underwater videographer and marine biologist like myself, you should be concerned about the well-documented decline in marine stocks over the years. Many of us have noted such decreases within our own lifetimes. If my son continues to hunt, I want him to have sufficient game present so he can take without seriously impacting "bug" populations for the future. I also want our waters to offer areas that are rich in species and diversity so scientists can study healthy ecosystems, and imagers like myself can record their beauty to share with others.

In my opinion, if we are to accomplish this successfully, there will have to be more marine protected areas (MPA's) established where no take is allowed. MPA's created throughout the world have documented the value of such an approach. Based on scientific evidence, they create regions where fish populations can recover and increase in number. The "spill over," adult fish and their larvae that leave the protected area to colonize reefs and other habitats outside it, increase fish stocks available for anglers. Anyone who has watched "party boats" fishing right off the Casino Point Dive Park know that many anglers understand the value of areas given some protection too. Anyone who dives or snorkels in the park can see first-hand the abundance there.

In 1999 the California legislature passed the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA). Its intent was to establish a scientifically-based, coherent series of marine protected areas along the California coast that would protect a sufficient number of locations to allow fish stocks to rebound, healthy ecosystems to emerge and "spill over" to replenish heavily fished areas outside the MPA's. The MLPA process has already designated networks of such protected areas in the States central and northern waters, and is now focusing on southern California including Catalina.

Next Wednesday, October 8th, a meeting will be held in our City Council chambers at 5:00 pm. Participants in the actual MLPA process are coming over from the mainland to explain the methods used in identifying areas for such protected status. They will hear input from the public on the MLPA, and specifically about areas within our waters that might be so set aside. Whether you are an angler, or a non-take snorkeler or SCUBA diver, I hope you will attend this meeting to gain a better understanding of the goals and procedures involved. We should all strive to leave the world better than we found it.

DDDB%20304%20catalina%20marine%20reserves%20part%201%20sm.jpg
 
Thanks for the good info. Its great to know that at least someone is always trying to preserve and protect!
 
This will be a really interesting process to watch develop. California has been a world leader in developing marine protected areas (MPAs) with a clear, science-backed public process. In a lot of other areas, MPAs have simple been declared by the government without the benefit of public or scientific involvement. In others, MPA development has been driven (and limited) by very vocal resource extractors who have been responsible for the current depleted state of many fisheries.

The science on MPAs is still pretty limited (as most studies on them are fairly new and short-term), but when well managed and enforced they do a dang good job. I hope folks out there can see what they've got and understand how important of a chance this is to protect what's left of their resources.
 
Going to the last meeting in March 2009 in Long Beach was an eye opener. The fishermen were out in force. The divers were non-existent. I did get one minute to speak. We needed a steady stream of divers there. It was mainly fishermen arguing how these Marine Protected Areas would put them out of business. Dr. Bill this kind of argument is a worth while cause for us who love the sea life. Thanks for originating that post. ..Hal
 
Thanks, Hal. It is an issue near and dear to my heart. Anyonme who has dived Catalina's dive park has seen the effect of even partial (but unofficial) protection on the population sizes and the size of individuals such as our large (bull) kelp bass and sheephead.

Gismonkey, there are actually a fair number of studies available that look at reserves dating back to the 1970's (three decades or more). I talk about them in another one of my columns posted on SB and on my website. Divers who have witnessed firsthand the reserves off the northern Channel Islands and Catalina have made good anecdotal comments about their effectiveness.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/

Back
Top Bottom