An engineer's answer would be that, given the metaphysical assumption that the world still functions independent of a person's observation ...
Given the quantum physical assumption, did the tree actually fall because of the observation?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
An engineer's answer would be that, given the metaphysical assumption that the world still functions independent of a person's observation ...
That’s because Huawei stoke so much of Cisco’s IP and got away with it.
Well.. they made the same routers for less money because they didn't have any R&D expense... I'm not sure that qualifies as better.And made better routers ...
Bingo.Well.. they made the same routers for less money because they didn't have any R&D expense... I'm not sure that qualifies as better.
Well.. they made the same routers for less money because they didn't have any R&D expense... I'm not sure that qualifies as better.
Prior to that. It is well documented that Huawei stole Cisco’s IP.You mean, Chinese postdocs who did the R until their profs were "regretfully unable to secure" that H1B, and Chinese workforce who built and manned the D, counts as zero expense? "Capitalism will be happy to sell us the rope" indeed.
Prior to that. It is well documented that Huawei stole Cisco’s IP.
surely you don’t deny that happened
Twice in my life I actually saw a tree fall in the forest-- seriously (well, once in the forest and once in a campground). It didn't know I was there. It did make a sound. Solved.