Shearwater Peregrine TX - Match DSAT?
- Thread starter BobbiK
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
- Messages
- 20,401
- Reaction score
- 19,674
- Location
- Philadelphia and Boynton Beach
- # of dives
- 1000 - 2499
Hi @BobbiK
Buhlmann with GF and DSAT do not run exactly the same for 1st clean dive or repetitive dives. DSAT is generally more liberal on 1st clean dive, particularly if deeper. Buhlmann is generally more liberal on repetitive dives, especially if shallower.
A GF high of 95 matches DSAT reasonably well for many dives.
I have posted about this before, including extremes
scubaboard.com
Buhlmann with GF and DSAT do not run exactly the same for 1st clean dive or repetitive dives. DSAT is generally more liberal on 1st clean dive, particularly if deeper. Buhlmann is generally more liberal on repetitive dives, especially if shallower.
A GF high of 95 matches DSAT reasonably well for many dives.
I have posted about this before, including extremes
DSAT vs GF high 95, examples
I have written previously about my experience diving DSAT and Buhlmann ZH-L16C with a GF high of 95. I have an example of what I have previously reported. This dive is a first dive of the day on the Castor in Boynton Beach. It was relatively deep with a max depth of 107 feet and an avg depth of...
Buhlmann with GF and DSAT do not run exactly the same for 1st clean dive or repetitive dives. DSAT is generally more liberal on 1st clean dive, particularly if deeper. Buhlmann is generally more liberal on repetitive dives, especially if shallower.
A GF high of 95 matches DSAT reasonably well for many dives.
I have posted about this before, including extremes
DSAT vs GF high 95, examples
I have written previously about my experience diving DSAT and Buhlmann ZH-L16C with a GF high of 95. I have an example of what I have previously reported. This dive is a first dive of the day on the Castor in Boynton Beach. It was relatively deep with a max depth of 107 feet and an avg depth of...
@scubadada if your oceanic had dual algorithm's would you run your backup as Pelagic Z+ (Buhlman ZHL-16c) vs keeping it on DSAT? I got a new backup computer (cobalt trade up to a proplus x) that has the dual algorithm's and I was planning on using the Z+ (to match my mk3i) but you can also not really adjust the GF on the ProPlus X other than turning on a Conservative option that decrease dive times by 1 altitude level.
I don't know much about the subject, so I always lean towards folks that have a much better ideal than I. I use to just exclusively dive DSAT many moons ago, before I got my atomic cobalt in 2011.
- Messages
- 20,401
- Reaction score
- 19,674
- Location
- Philadelphia and Boynton Beach
- # of dives
- 1000 - 2499
Hi @staggsSevin
I have been running an Oceanic computer with DSAT since 2002. I have run a number of 2nd computers, one running Buhlmann and GF since 2016.
I have no experience with PZ+. I believe it would be reasonably matched with a GF high of 85, maybe 90, you would have to see.
You have 4 choices on an Oceanic computer, from most liberal to most conservative, DSAT, PZ+, DSAT with conservatism, PZ+ with conservatism
I have been running an Oceanic computer with DSAT since 2002. I have run a number of 2nd computers, one running Buhlmann and GF since 2016.
I have no experience with PZ+. I believe it would be reasonably matched with a GF high of 85, maybe 90, you would have to see.
You have 4 choices on an Oceanic computer, from most liberal to most conservative, DSAT, PZ+, DSAT with conservatism, PZ+ with conservatism
Similar threads
- Poll
