Underlines added.we probably could include normalised data sets for people who get squished by hippos, mauled by their own pet dog, or die on the toilet due to unnecessary straining....
Statistics are a good way of keeping statisticians employed but the reality is often different. I could tell you that there have been (these numbers are purely imaginary) 10 fatal shark attacks in Sharm over 40 years with approximately 15 million tourists. That makes Sharm sound safe really - but of those 15 million, 10 million visited in the last 7 years and 4 attacks happened in the last week. Now it doesn't sound quite so great.
The point is, statistics are meaningless unless other influential factors are taken into account. Statistically, there is unlikely to be a fatal shark attack in Sharm for the next n years, where n is a number greater than 2 - but that does not take into account the prescence of an angry female longimanus with an appetite for people - and she's still in the area. If the beaches are opened too soon, the statistical likelihood of another fatal attack in the next week is approximately 100%.
C.
Thanks for making this point, and for your factual accounts of the situation there. Statistics really don't mean much under these circumstances. And I cannot imagine that anybody with a functioning brain would go snorkeling or swimming in the area where the attacks occurred. Of course, not everyone has a functioning brain.