Shark Hunt in Western Australia

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Whenever they had fatal shark attacks in Hawaii, the Shark Task Force would go out and round up the usual suspects. Twice they brought in 16' tiger sharks - huge deadly looking things even on the boat ramps.
They stopped doing this - after a tertiary giant shark would be culled in a given area, there would be more of the 8' to 12'ers around, and the consensus was that this would actually lead to more shark attacks.
If that poor SOB really did get eaten by a 20' GW, since it's a pelagic roamer, it's probably wandered off. They're opportunistic feeders - after all, they're not going to hit 20' being vegetarians.
I ran into a 15' hammerhead once in Moanlua Bay in low viz - from the belly to the top of the dorsal fin, it was as tall as I am - 6'+. I bet a 20' GW would make that one look like a baby.
I guess one thing about diving is that depending on the dive, you're not necessarily that high up on the food chain.
 
molksmith:
Well,
everyone has to cave in to the media and the public wants blood.

Here is the link to the news piece on the shark attack/Shark Hunt

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200503/s1327524.htm


and here is the email address of the WA Fishery Office if you feel like getting pro-active and protesting what will surely be a lot of dead sharks..

headoffice@fish.wa.gov.au

World news link from yesterday,
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-1534941,00.html
The debate continues......
 

Back
Top Bottom