Johnoly
Contributor
- Messages
- 4,459
- Reaction score
- 6,346
- # of dives
- 2500 - 4999
I've seen it on the JW Fisher tow-behinds that had scans at DEMA. They were discussing partially buried artifacts they could identify fully compared to a camera that would miss it. Below is a regular sonar snap of a dive ledge not side scan which is a very different frequency. This is a different frequency and gain adjusted. You can see the thin layer of sand on top, the red rock below the sand and then it's just noise below that. We use this many time to find the difference between a sanded filled in hole versus a good rock hard bottom that lobsters like to hide in. It's not automatic and it's not perfect at all. The bounce back received is just a "good guess" as to whether it's a spot to dive and waste precious bottom time on.Do you have an example reading of what that would look like? Looking "through" the silt?
In the end, all the sonars on the market are setup differently. You can't even put 6 different sonars on the same boat because they will likely interfere with each other. So you pick the best aspects that you normally dive and work to get it dialed in the best you can. Even a different transducer will either improve or trash your current setup.