How much more visible is a laser than a bright strobe?
So let's say that I don't have a green light that has a very small beam width, but instead I have a white light that is very intense. If I shine the white light in their eyes they come and the green light they don't? Hmmmm…..
M²
It as been pointed out, by a pilot, that the proper laser technique is to point it upward and perhaps wiggle it a bit to create a vertical beam or cone that is very visible. Not to shine it at the aircraft or the horizon where the rescue or other aircraft might be.
I do not know the trade off in visibility strobe vs laser.
A strobe radiating like a point-source and loses power (to an observer) proportional to the distance squared, as the energy spreads out in an expanding sphere. So if it is X bright at 1m, it is X/4 at 2m, X/9 at 3m, ... X/10,000 at 100m, .... X/1,000,000 at 1Km .... Atmospheric interference will make it worse, a little or a lot depending on conditions. Think clear, haze, then pea-soup fog. Now human vision is somewhat logarithmic, so we perceive the loss to be less, but it still goes down by a massive amount as we get further away.
A laser's power incidence is
much more complicated (I saw forum discussions about the differing opinions that rival SB debates on pony bottles), but suffice it to say that a well collimated beam of light will spread very little in ideal conditions over a very long distance, to deliver its power in a concentrated area. So yea, pupil sized at multi-Km distances. Atmospheric disturbances, will definitely act to scatter the light and reduce its incident power. Actually, without the atmospheric scattering, you wouldn't be able to see the beam form the side. That is where the "point it upward and perhaps wiggle it a bit to create a vertical beam or cone" comes in. If there is the right balance of scattering, the beam can still punch through a long distance, but becomes visible from the side.