The "flowering" of the tank indicates multiple failure points, which is usually indicative of rapid pressure changes. The split line is indicative of a single failure point. The initial failure is caused by pressure, not potential energy.
I suppose, put another way, it is easy to gradually increase the tank pressure with a gas - this is likely what happened. It is similarly difficult to gradually increase the tank pressure with a liquid, at least with most hydraulic setups.
Again - good observations. With the hydrotest, it was filled with hyraualic fluid, connected to the pump, and the pressure in the system was slowly increased. When the ultimate strength of the metal was reached, the cylinder failed with a split down its length. The split was slightly wider at the midpoint (probably where the failure initiated). When the failure occurred, the fluid escaped and the pressure dropped to ambient. Lets say the cylinder was about a liter in volume (it was actually less) and the line and pump may have had a small fraction of a liter between them. Since the fluid is virtually incompressible, there was just not that much fluid to release once the cylinder failed. Much of it remained in the cylinder and the fluid in the line and pump all remained where it started.
Pneumatic test - fill with gas (let's pretend it behaves as an ideal gas the entire time) and connect to line and gas compressor. Start increasing the pressure by adding more gas. PV=nRT We can take our time and let the system cool to ambient temperature, the cylinder is of a known, fixed volume (excluding high pressure creep) thus pressure in the cylinder is directly related to moles of gas (or mass of gas if your prefer) in the cylinder. When the ultimate pressure is reached, a small failure initiates, similar to the hydro case. However, there is soooo much more gas that has to escape, because all those moles of gas were compressed into the small volume. As the energy is released, the metal is "pushed out of the way" by the expanding gas. The "flower" effect comes as the metal continues to fail along grain boundaries as it gets displaced further from its original cylindrical shape. It tears into ragged edges. Some high speed photography would be really cool, but I don't have any.
In both cases the failure is caused by over pressure, and initiates at the same point, by the same mechanism. With the hydro, the failure relieves all the pressure quickly, as the fluid does not expand when the failure occurs. The pressure drops to ambient and the event is over. With the pneumatic test, all the added gas must leave the cylinder through the failure point before the pressure will be at ambient. Thus the event lasts a bit longer (still very fast). The escaping gas ripping the metal apart creates a larger opening for the remaining gas to vent through.
How am I doing? Is this getting clearer? Thanks!