is that a dive training pool in the middle back of the plane?
You know it is. The pilot just has to take it real easy on the turns.
Theoretically, you could do a barrel roll with a diver training pool on board and not spill a drop. Done properly it can (and should) be a 1 G maneuver from start to finish.
------
On the DC-3 the floats are right under the engines so they tend to act as spray deflectors. It actually works better than the single hull of, for example, a Grumman Widgeon or Goose, where the engines are mounted as high as possible but still fairly low over the water. Spray on a piston engine is not all that big a deal but spray can be hard on a propeller blade's leading edge. over the long term, salt water corrosion is the big killer of sea planes.
Jet engines are a different story. If you look at business jets up close, you will often note a raised ridge on the nedge of the nose wheel. That is a spray deflector to keep rain water (and for that matter small pebbles and rocks) on the runway out of the engine inlets. For a turbine powered sea plane it's vital to keep spray on takeoff or landing out of the engines. That results in the engines being mounted high and generally shielded from spray by the wing.
----
A Grumman Goose is more or less a really small version of an Albatross in general concept. The Goose is an 8 seat aircraft and the smaller Widgeon is a 5 seat aircraft. Both preceded the larger 12 seat Mallard and the Mallard led directly to the larger Albatross. The G-111 civil variant of the HU-16 Albatross could carry 28 passengers plus crew, so in comparision it is a seriously large airplane compared to the other Grumman seaplanes.
You could carry a decent load over a short range in the Widgeon, Goose or Mallard, but you could
live on board an HU-16 Albatross and fly it pretty much anywhere in the world. With fuel in the mains, tip floats and drop tanks an HU-16 has a range of over 3000 nautical miles. But at a 108 kt economy cruise speed, it will take you a long time to get there. Alternatively you can use a higher cruise speed around 150 kts for about a 2800 nautical mile range buring about 100 gallons of fuel per hour. Max cruise speed is 195 kts but gives a much shorter range due to the much higher power settings and higher fuel consumption.
Serious fun and serious capability, but seriously expensive to fly and maintain. Still, it would make destinations like Truk and Bikini fairly easy (and fun) to get to.