uwxplorer
Contributor
My point is simply that we don't know at this point in time so why jump to conclusions? What you're describing could be medical, equipment failure, or a panic attack that is very real to the victim whether or not there's any real reason to panic. I'm only suggesting that you're making a lot of assumptions, assuming your assumptions are true, and then reaching a conclusion that the eventual facts may not support.
OK, fair enough. I did not present anything as incontrovertible truth. But with plenty of gas, and a fully redundant setup (I can't recall whether the diver had a deco cylinder with him - but he probably had a second 2nd stage regulator, and whether his buddy was the only single cylinder diver or another twinset diver), the possibility of equipment failure seems remote. Remember, they had come back to 30-40 ft, possibly shallower without any major problem.
Note that I did not advance any possible medical cause either. It could be any of the causes listed by Sudzfd or some other ones, or maybe none and as you say, a simple panic attack. I'll leave it at that, being skeptical that there will be any further evidence brought forward.
I feel for this diver. I gave him a hand to stand up from the bench on the first dive. I talked and joked with him, had lunch with him on the boat. That he did not make it is upsetting, especially when my first buddy canned his first dive at 10 ft, with my complete understanding and support. The diver might have had no warning signs that things would go wrong and that is exactly what I wanted to say, independent of whether the initial problem had a medical nature or not. When you have warning signs, the decision process is straightforward. When you don't have any (as in the case of lack of fitness not being an impediment on land or even in water when everything goes right), that's when there is no escaping potentially dire consequences.
Last edited: