When I was there two years ago, some people were raving about how healthy the reefs were--so green! I opened a book and showed them the pictures of the green algae they were raving about.
Roatan reef bleaching/ health?
- Thread starter SCUBAJOE54
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
OMyMyOHellYes
Contributor
So you had to edumacate them that corals are animals, not plants? Did you offer them the underwater naturalist course?
also_anon_dc
Contributor
There is plenty of healthy coral around Utila (and I assume Roatan and Guanaja as well), it's just all below 30'. All the bleaching I've seen is in the shallow water (it's bad there, all pillar coral is dead and so is most brain coral) but once you're at 35'-40' you're not aware of any issues. I'm in Utila 3-4 times a year and we've had summer water temps above 87f for 5 years in a row now. It's hard to imagine temps dropping anytime soon, so this is probably the new norm - soft coral above 30', hard corals in deeper water.
This comment is not specific to Roatan but to the concept of bleaching in general.
Not too long ago I was in a different Caribbean area and made a comment about how disappointed I was in the state of the coral. The year before I made similar comments about the state of the coral I saw in Beqa Lagoon in Fiji. In response to both observations (both in SB and elsewhere), some people said they were in the same area and did not see any signs of bleaching.
What they should have said was that they did not see any signs of current bleaching in the coral that is still there. I was referring to the vast stretches of rock that used to be living coral before they were bleached in years past. I get the idea that for some people, if they look long enough and hard enough to find a single piece of coral and deem it healthy, they will say that the reef is doing fine--no sign of bleaching.
Not too long ago I was in a different Caribbean area and made a comment about how disappointed I was in the state of the coral. The year before I made similar comments about the state of the coral I saw in Beqa Lagoon in Fiji. In response to both observations (both in SB and elsewhere), some people said they were in the same area and did not see any signs of bleaching.
What they should have said was that they did not see any signs of current bleaching in the coral that is still there. I was referring to the vast stretches of rock that used to be living coral before they were bleached in years past. I get the idea that for some people, if they look long enough and hard enough to find a single piece of coral and deem it healthy, they will say that the reef is doing fine--no sign of bleaching.
Similar threads
