Risks to going Solo

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Scubaru_Steve

Contributor
Messages
86
Reaction score
4
Location
Pennsylvania
# of dives
0 - 24
So I see time and time again in the "Accidents and Incidents" folder of divers passing away while on solo dives. Now I have seen divers at various shallow dive spots (rivers, small ponds, etc) diving solo in water no deeper than 20'. Is there a lot of inherent risk at these depths if your alone? I understand anything can happen, weather it be you get snagged, run out of air, and numerous other issues...but is the risk less if you are solo in waters shallower than 20' vs below 33'?

Just trying to get a feel for whats what in scuba. Thanks!
 
The deeper the diver goes and the longer the diver stays, there is a concomitant increase in risk. The same is true whether a diver is solo or in a team, so from that aspect, yes, there is increased risk in diving deeper.
Being solo adds the risk of having no one to help you if you can't help yourself - so, there is an increased risk of drowning should a solo diver suffer some debilitating event like a heart attack or stroke underwater - but depth has little to do with that particular risk, so from that perspective, the properly prepared solo diver's risk doesn't change much due to depth because he/she is solo. The increased risks of depth apply pretty much equally to the solo or team dive.
Rick
 
I have read soooo many of these posts/threads. I'm not a solo diver, nor do I really plan to be. That said, I think a properly trained, equipped and experienced solo diver has the same risk as an average buddy team, minus the health concerns. Has proper tools to free him/herself as needed, the experience to remain calm while doing so, avoids situations that complicate the dive and has his/her own redundant air supply. Still, at a little over 50 dives, the idea of it is too intimidating for me so I'll pass!!
 
I treat ALL dives as a solo dive.
 
Is there a lot of inherent risk at these depths if your alone?

There in no more or less inherent risk. The risk in diving is due to the environment. However, as Rich noted, if you have a problem, no one will be there to help you. (of course when diving with a buddy, there's no guarantee he/she will be able to help you)

but is the risk less if you are solo in waters shallower than 20' vs below 33'?

I have a hard time saying 20 feet is substantially less risky than 34.
 
First off, if you want to be safe stay on the boat. The ocean is a dangerous place, the buddy system is responsible for a lot of still alive divers. When something goes wrong you have help nearby...... if you are actually diving the buddy system. The realistic buddy system .... same ocean same day won't really be a lot of help should you have an issue. My advice is if you were ready to dive solo then you wouldn't be asking the question so don't start just yet. Personally I have done way more solo dives than I should talk about so I won't talk about them here. Dive what you were taught and pay attention to others, you never know when you will learn something new and for gosh sakes never give advice on the internet. You could get sued that way. Good luck and dive a lot, you'll know when your ready for new challenges
Bill
 
So I see time and time again in the "Accidents and Incidents" folder of divers passing away while on solo dives. Now I have seen divers at various shallow dive spots (rivers, small ponds, etc) diving solo in water no deeper than 20'. Is there a lot of inherent risk at these depths if your alone? I understand anything can happen, weather it be you get snagged, run out of air, and numerous other issues...but is the risk less if you are solo in waters shallower than 20' vs below 33'?

Just trying to get a feel for whats what in scuba. Thanks!

First off, I am going to establish that I sometimes dive solo. I am a scuba instructor for an agency that promotes buddy diving. I believe in the buddy system and I try to instill proper buddy skills in the students I teach. I also believe that solo diving has inherent risks, and that like every other activity that an adult human being can participate in, you need to understand the risks, weigh them against the potential reasons why you are doing the activity, and make your own decisions.

That's where my perspective comes from.

As to the reports you read ... almost all of those accidents you hear about are a result not of people choosing to solo dive, but of people who separated from their buddy and had something bad happen to them. I want to establish that there is a difference between solo diving and buddy separation.

What are those differences?

Well, a solo diver is someone who is mentally and physically prepared to dive alone. They are someone who has given some consideration to the additional risks of diving alone, thought about the things that can go wrong, and prepared to deal with those risks without having to rely on someone else. Those risks are not inconsequential ... and solo diving should never be taken lightly. As someone who solo dives, I firmly believe that someone with just a handful of dives under their weightbelt should not solo dive ... regardless of how "comfortable" they think they are in the water. The reason is that diving is, by its nature, a contextual experience. We humans learn from experience ... and the underwater environment is an experience unlike anything we've done before. We've evolved with a certain level of reflex actions that, over time, became "hard-wired" in our brain. Those reflex actions ... what you see referred to as "fight or flight" instincts ... were developed to keep us alive. Unfortunately, they're intended to work on a surface-bound environment ... and underwater they can kill you. When we learn to dive, we effectively have to "re-wire" our brain to accommodate a different set of instinctive responses that will help us resolve problems that we encounter ... problems that will lead to stress, and if not resolved can eventually lead to a sense of panic that is extremely dangerous. Perhaps the most important aspect of having a buddy is that merely the presence of another human being can often short-circuit those instincts and help us resolve underwater difficulties in a more reasoned, rational manner.

So what leads to these accidents you read about? Well ... mostly it's a lack of buddy skills. Traditional dive training teaches us that we should always dive with a buddy ... but it doesn't always teach us how. We learn a few techniques by rote ... without really developing an understanding of why they work, and under what conditions they work ... and we try to apply it to all the diving we do. But what doesn't usually get emphasized is the importance of communication with the person you're diving with, and what changes in our behavior we need to impose in order to communicate well with our dive buddies. Good buddy skills start long before you hit the water. They start by establishing a mutual set of goals for the dive, by agreeing on a dive plan, by imposing enough self-discipline to STICK to the dive plan, and by monitoring and communicating with each other during the dive. These are all skills that most divers only ever get introduced to in class, and that get developed through conscious effort as you log more and more dives. It's also important to talk to each other AFTER the dive to establish what worked, what didn't work, what you felt comfortable with, and what you didn't.

But most divers don't really do that ... because it never occurs to them that they should. They apply the "rules" they learned in class ... and sometimes this leads to confusion, a lack of communication, and buddy separation.

And then they are alone ... but they are not "diving solo" ... they are diving a broken dive plan, and should immediately begin the buddy separation procedure they taught you in class. When they don't, bad things often happen ... because this is a diver who is neither mentally nor physically prepared to be diving alone.

I do occasionally run into people who are attempting a solo dive when it is obvious by casual observation that they should not be. These people are simply taking risks they shouldn't be taking. But again, it's their choice to do so. Often they are completely unaware of the risks ... because they haven't really thought about what CAN go wrong, or they have an inflated sense of their own skill level and readiness to solo dive. Darwin has a special place for these folks, and there really isn't a whole lot anyone can do to prevent them.

What I urge you and any other newer diver to do is give some thought to what it takes to become a solo diver. But also give some thought to what it takes to be a good dive buddy ... because these are not unrelated thoughts. Being good at either one takes a similar thought process ...

- Is this dive plan appropriate to my skill and experience level?
- Do I have the self-discipline to stick to the dive plan?
- Do I have the skills and equipment I would need to handle an emergency?
- Do I even know what could go wrong, and what I would do if it did?
- Have I practiced my emergency skills to the point where I would be able to perform them while stressed out or task-loaded?
- Would I recognize when a stressful situation would make it prudent to end a dive prematurely?

... and a whole host of other questions that may relate to the specific environment or situation you're diving in.

Sometime ago I wrote an article on solo diving that might give you some other ideas about things you would want to know and think about before considering whether solo diving was something you are ready for ... or even something you would ever want to consider.

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
 
There in no more or less inherent risk. The risk in diving is due to the environment. However, as Rich noted, if you have a problem, no one will be there to help you. (of course when diving with a buddy, there's no guarantee he/she will be able to help you)



I have a hard time saying 20 feet is substantially less risky than 34.

Blackwood, do you hump all that gear down behind Marine Land or even Flat Rock?
I used to gripe with a single steel tank
Bill
 
Blackwood, do you hump all that gear down behind Marine Land or even Flat Rock?
I used to gripe with a single steel tank
Bill

LOL. No.

I won't even do marine land in a drysuit.
 
I lived on the Esplanade for years and ended buying a dive boat and living on it in King Harbor. Used to have really good luck down near a large square or rectangular storm drain outfall just outside the kelp beds there. I liked to freedive as well as use scuba.
 

Back
Top Bottom