I agree with you, @scubadada
The new graph features are very nice. And now, my end-dive recorded GF seems to match the max on the graph!
How nice it is to have a company that listens to its divers!
But I confess, I'm trying to learn the utility of having SurGF in the display, other than curiosity about how high it got during the dive.
Since I was finally able to get my phone (although not my laptop) to upload dives to Subsurface, I can now evaluate SurGF after I transfer the dives via my account to the laptop. Perhaps Shearwater will get around to this request too, though they have a lot on their plate with the new Tern.
But what should I be looking for in comparing SurGF with my GF99? I thought about riding some GF99 in a continuous ascent, instead of making stops on my next deco dive. If I felt okay after surfacing, it would be interesting to look at the convergence of SurGF with my surfacing GF99, but what other information would that give me?
Again, a shout out to Shearwater!!!
The new graph features are very nice. And now, my end-dive recorded GF seems to match the max on the graph!
How nice it is to have a company that listens to its divers!
But I confess, I'm trying to learn the utility of having SurGF in the display, other than curiosity about how high it got during the dive.
Since I was finally able to get my phone (although not my laptop) to upload dives to Subsurface, I can now evaluate SurGF after I transfer the dives via my account to the laptop. Perhaps Shearwater will get around to this request too, though they have a lot on their plate with the new Tern.
But what should I be looking for in comparing SurGF with my GF99? I thought about riding some GF99 in a continuous ascent, instead of making stops on my next deco dive. If I felt okay after surfacing, it would be interesting to look at the convergence of SurGF with my surfacing GF99, but what other information would that give me?
Again, a shout out to Shearwater!!!