I think you are planning on one more failure than usual.
This is, of course, true. It's just that being on the loop with no bailout freaks me out!
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I think you are planning on one more failure than usual.
DoctorMike,
I think it’s a great article. As an OC diver who has never seen a CCR or a SCR, other than reading about them for a while now, it provided some very nice insights. I’ve been an OC diver since 1959, and so have seen a few things over the years.
One thing I did not see in the article is the ability to establish positive buoyancy for the CCR diver on the surface. For instance, it is unknown to me whether a CCR wearing a dry suit (most do, from what I can see), also wears a weight belt or has ditchable weights. OC divers usually either wear a weight belt or have ditchable weights in the BCD, but this is (maybe) not true for CCR divers. This is a fundamental difference which needs to be covered, if true.
Now, about the dilutant flush; in an emergency with an unresponsive diver, I can see the need for this flush. But I have also note the loss of a National Geographic photographer, Wes Silks, on a rebreather dive where he was found in shallow water unconscious. I’m wondering whether an O2 flush would be more appropriate in these circumstances.
National Geographic Freelance Photographer Wes Skiles Dies
Finally, you talk a lot of “communication,” which is something I have thought about for a long time. I had, in 1972, the idea of building an underwater communication hard-wire system between buddy divers using the buddy line/comm. line system to allow voice communications between two divers. I never got that off the ground, and here we are, fifty years later, still dependent upon hand signals and light flashes. That, to me, doesn’t make sense. CCR divers spend tens of thousands of dollars on breathing systems, and no one applies known technology to make voice communications between divers available! I am amazed that this is not a priority. This would be especially helpful between buddy pairs where one buddy was OC and the other was CCR diving. Why? Why is this so hard for the diving community to make happen?
SeaRat
DoctorMike,
I think it’s a great article. As an OC diver who has never seen a CCR or a SCR, other than reading about them for a while now, it provided some very nice insights. I’ve been an OC diver since 1959, and so have seen a few things over the years.
One thing I did not see in the article is the ability to establish positive buoyancy for the CCR diver on the surface. For instance, it is unknown to me whether a CCR wearing a dry suit (most do, from what I can see), also wears a weight belt or has ditchable weights. OC divers usually either wear a weight belt or have ditchable weights in the BCD, but this is (maybe) not true for CCR divers. This is a fundamental difference which needs to be covered, if true.
Now, about the dilutant flush; in an emergency with an unresponsive diver, I can see the need for this flush. But I have also note the loss of a National Geographic photographer, Wes Skiles, on a rebreather dive where he was found in shallow water unconscious. I’m wondering whether an O2 flush would be more appropriate in these circumstances.
National Geographic Freelance Photographer Wes Skiles Dies
Finally, you talk a lot of “communication,” which is something I have thought about for a long time. I had, in 1972, the idea of building an underwater communication hard-wire system between buddy divers using the buddy line/comm. line system to allow voice communications between two divers. I never got that off the ground, and here we are, fifty years later, still dependent upon hand signals and light flashes. That, to me, doesn’t make sense. CCR divers spend tens of thousands of dollars on breathing systems, and no one applies known technology to make voice communications between divers available! I am amazed that this is not a priority. This would be especially helpful between buddy pairs where one buddy was OC and the other was CCR diving. Why? Why is this so hard for the diving community to make happen?
SeaRat
hi mike
I have to agree with @KenGordon on the article - theres simply way too much information - e.g do OC divers really need to know a schematic ? I bet most ccr divers couldn't write it out .
I guess it depends on what you are trying to with the article /notes. Are you trying to create a checklist that OC divers can understand in a predive brief? As it stands it has the feel of some sort of course like intro to MOD1 for OC divers, I imagine youll get a lot of OC divers likely @johndiver999 who will be put off by mixed teams by reading the article.
It really needs to be broken down to ABC this would be a good appendix for CCR divers to take away and print out to give it to their OC buddies
Your summary is pretty good and that would be pretty much all an OC diver who knows very little about ccrs can absorb. Anything beyond that will just create confusion.
FFMs with communications are available, but not inexpensive. FFMs with rebreathers and comms get complex, but not impossible.DoctorMike,
I think it’s a great article. As an OC diver who has never seen a CCR or a SCR, other than reading about them for a while now, it provided some very nice insights. I’ve been an OC diver since 1959, and so have seen a few things over the years.
One thing I did not see in the article is the ability to establish positive buoyancy for the CCR diver on the surface. For instance, it is unknown to me whether a CCR wearing a dry suit (most do, from what I can see), also wears a weight belt or has ditchable weights. OC divers usually either wear a weight belt or have ditchable weights in the BCD, but this is (maybe) not true for CCR divers. This is a fundamental difference which needs to be covered, if true.
Now, about the dilutant flush; in an emergency with an unresponsive diver, I can see the need for this flush. But I have also note the loss of a National Geographic photographer, Wes Skiles, on a rebreather dive where he was found in shallow water unconscious. I’m wondering whether an O2 flush would be more appropriate in these circumstances.
National Geographic Freelance Photographer Wes Skiles Dies
Finally, you talk a lot of “communication,” which is something I have thought about for a long time. I had, in 1972, the idea of building an underwater communication hard-wire system between buddy divers using the buddy line/comm. line system to allow voice communications between two divers. I never got that off the ground, and here we are, fifty years later, still dependent upon hand signals and light flashes. That, to me, doesn’t make sense. CCR divers spend tens of thousands of dollars on breathing systems, and no one applies known technology to make voice communications between divers available! I am amazed that this is not a priority. This would be especially helpful between buddy pairs where one buddy was OC and the other was CCR diving. Why? Why is this so hard for the diving community to make happen?
SeaRat