This thread is directed to any of the many fine ScubaBoard participants who are professionals in the field of medicine. I hope there can be either a reasonable explanation or a good correction for any misunderstanding I might have regarding the issue I am about to describe.
Scuba is currently experiencing a rapid uptick in what had previously been a slowly growing problem--the number of hospitals refusing to treat scuba divers with suspected decompression illness, even when they have both the required equipment and the staff expertise to do so. Everyone knows that treatment for both decompression sickness and lung overexpansion injuries should begin as soon as possible after diagnosis, and the failure to provide such treatment in a timely manner can be fatal.
The reason usually stated for refusing to provide such treatment is profitability. Recompression chambers are most profitable for a hospital when they are used to treat a number of patients for a variety of injuries simultaneously and without the need for personnel to be in the chamber with them. A scuba diver's recompression schedule will usually be different from the schedules used to treat these other patients, meqaning that diver will be treated alone, and that diver will need to have attention. This apparently is unacceptable to a growing number of hospitals.
I know that this is happening a lot in cave country--north Florida--where decompression sickness should be considered a significant threat. A recent DCS case involved a ScubaBoard regular who had to drive to Valdosta, Georgia, to find treatment.
It seems very strange to me that a hospital can refuse to treat people under these circumstances. I'm wondering about the ethics of it all.
Scuba is currently experiencing a rapid uptick in what had previously been a slowly growing problem--the number of hospitals refusing to treat scuba divers with suspected decompression illness, even when they have both the required equipment and the staff expertise to do so. Everyone knows that treatment for both decompression sickness and lung overexpansion injuries should begin as soon as possible after diagnosis, and the failure to provide such treatment in a timely manner can be fatal.
The reason usually stated for refusing to provide such treatment is profitability. Recompression chambers are most profitable for a hospital when they are used to treat a number of patients for a variety of injuries simultaneously and without the need for personnel to be in the chamber with them. A scuba diver's recompression schedule will usually be different from the schedules used to treat these other patients, meqaning that diver will be treated alone, and that diver will need to have attention. This apparently is unacceptable to a growing number of hospitals.
I know that this is happening a lot in cave country--north Florida--where decompression sickness should be considered a significant threat. A recent DCS case involved a ScubaBoard regular who had to drive to Valdosta, Georgia, to find treatment.
It seems very strange to me that a hospital can refuse to treat people under these circumstances. I'm wondering about the ethics of it all.