John Gulliver
Contributor
I've read some of Thom Hogan's camera and lens reviews. They're very good. But so are Ken Rockwell's. I know a couple of professional photographers who won't buy a lens without reading what Ken Rockwell says about it.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
No, CS2.Hi Brewski have you got V6 as I cant read these DNG files in V6
Re Ken Rockwell's qualifications: "This page generates controversy because fact doesn't always agree with old wives' tales circulated by newcomers to digital photography in chat rooms. I'm sharing what works for me gathered across three decades of continuous full-time paid professional experience in digital imaging. In addition I was studying digital imaging for ten years before I got my engineering degree and started as a professional working with the guys with Ph.Ds in mathematics who invented all this."
What qualivfications do the people who mock him and thoink you should do the opposite of what he recommends have ?![]()
A master of self promotion.No idea who this Ken Rockwell guy is...
I don't hold myself up there as an expert to say who is right or wrong, but the criticism I have read of KR is not of his qualifications, but rather his methods. Some people seem to believe that he reviews lenses based on their spec sheet and not based on using them.