Reg Braithwaite
Contributor
I dive. I also rock climb. Both are risky endeavours. Now, "risky" is a relative term. Once upon a time, both activities were fringe sports practiced by a few wild-eyed crazies. Over time, we figured out how to manage the risks and popularize the activities to the point where they are now practiced by people who wouldn't consider themselves risk-takers.
Open Circuit Scuba is now considered "mainstream." For the most part, we are no longer wild-eyed crazies. But.
There are still serious consequences for mistakes or bad luck in Scuba. Even for open water diving in benign conditions, water is unforgiving. Consider, for example, the consequences of having a coughing fit when cruising a reef at 35'. They are not the same as the consequences of having a coughing fit while watching television.
Diving is inherently an activity where we willingly and knowingly risk our lives in the pursuit of happiness. I don't care how it is marketed, it is an activity with serious consequences. I'm ok with that. I'm also ok with people having the right to choose their own tolerance for risk. Who am I to tell someone to stay on the couch while I go rock climbing?
On another thread there are a number of peopel advising a large person not to dive. This saddens me. Who are we to pick a line and say, people on this side dive, people on that side don't dive? Why do people get upset at the idea of being told that smokers should not dive, but are ok with telling someone who is 400lbs not to dive?
Some risks are manageable. For example, training and proper equipment selection can reduce the risk of objective hazards on ceratin types of dives to levels you may consider acceptable. So I would not compare the risks inherent in being a stout diver to the risk of diving in an overhead environment. The way to manage the risk of being large is to lose weight. Someone may not do so for a variety of reasons that are none of my business. They choose which risks to tolerate and which to manage, and by how much.
Until such time as they ask me to be their buddy and thus bring their risk into my dive, it's their call to make. I champion giving them the cold, hard facts so that they can make an informed choice. But after that, I say let them make the call.
Telling them not to dive seems to repudiate the very basis of this sport, the fundamental choice you make when you stand on the edge of the boat and make a giant stride into the water. You choose to dive, you choose the amount of risk you wish to tolerate in the pursuit of the experience.
fin.
Open Circuit Scuba is now considered "mainstream." For the most part, we are no longer wild-eyed crazies. But.
There are still serious consequences for mistakes or bad luck in Scuba. Even for open water diving in benign conditions, water is unforgiving. Consider, for example, the consequences of having a coughing fit when cruising a reef at 35'. They are not the same as the consequences of having a coughing fit while watching television.
Diving is inherently an activity where we willingly and knowingly risk our lives in the pursuit of happiness. I don't care how it is marketed, it is an activity with serious consequences. I'm ok with that. I'm also ok with people having the right to choose their own tolerance for risk. Who am I to tell someone to stay on the couch while I go rock climbing?
On another thread there are a number of peopel advising a large person not to dive. This saddens me. Who are we to pick a line and say, people on this side dive, people on that side don't dive? Why do people get upset at the idea of being told that smokers should not dive, but are ok with telling someone who is 400lbs not to dive?
Some risks are manageable. For example, training and proper equipment selection can reduce the risk of objective hazards on ceratin types of dives to levels you may consider acceptable. So I would not compare the risks inherent in being a stout diver to the risk of diving in an overhead environment. The way to manage the risk of being large is to lose weight. Someone may not do so for a variety of reasons that are none of my business. They choose which risks to tolerate and which to manage, and by how much.
Until such time as they ask me to be their buddy and thus bring their risk into my dive, it's their call to make. I champion giving them the cold, hard facts so that they can make an informed choice. But after that, I say let them make the call.
Telling them not to dive seems to repudiate the very basis of this sport, the fundamental choice you make when you stand on the edge of the boat and make a giant stride into the water. You choose to dive, you choose the amount of risk you wish to tolerate in the pursuit of the experience.
fin.