I
idocsteve
Guest
well its not as if the person who gave him the octo could actually REFUSE to do so. That WOULD be tantamount to murder or maybe manslaughter or something if Andy would have ended up drowning because someone refused to give him air.
You have a point that could be raised in defense. "Damned if you do, damned if you don't".
It's not like a couple of people were swimming along, one snorkeling and the other diving and the diver said "hey come breathe off my snorkel it's cool!", and the resulting experiment ended with the snorkeler embolizing.
I suppose a strong case could be made that this was done with the intent of saving a life.
Still you never know. Here in the US "well meaning rescuers" get sued ALL the time.
There are supposed to be "Good Samaritan" laws on the books to prevent this from happening but a good attorney with a greedy family with pockets to fill won't hesitate to file a law suit if they think they've got a chance to convince a sympathetic jury.