Vercingetorix
Registered
I'm about to lay-out cash for my next piece of gear: BC. I already own a reg (Aeris Pro, Mares Octo, Oceanic Veo 250 computer console). I've got a Zeagle Brigade on lay-away. But I'm slowly starting to queston the wisdom of this choice. Not the quality of the BC rig; rather, do I want to go BC or BP/W?
I realize such a broad question will engender much discussion, agreement, and heated debate. Good. I further realize basic questions must be answered:
1. What kind of diving will I do? Recreational, wreck, cave, tech, nekkid,etc? I'm open to all posissibilities, except the last. Texas lakes are far too cold, otherwise...<GRIN>
2. What is my budget? For purposes of this discussion, I'm in the $400 to $600 range. Beyond $600, I may have to put a divorce lawyer on retainer, which would further reduce my dive gear budget.
3. What is my experience? I'm NAUI OW certified with only the 5 certification dives under my belt.
During the pool and OW dives, I used the Zeagle Brigade exclusively; this is a back-inflate. Several folks recommmended it. I prefer back-inflate, so BP/W is a simple transition.
For me, the scope of the debate centers on the convenience of the all-in-one BC with it's integrated weight system, pockets, D-rings versus the BP/W which requires a weight belt and fewer D-rings, and no pockets. The BP/W has less bouyancy than the BC and therefore, requires less weighting. An SS backplate may mean no weight at all, dependent upon whether I'm in freshwater or salt.
A BP/W with a 50-55# lift and STA means I can go doubles or single tank A BC is designed either for a single or a double. The Brigade I used had a 45# Ranger bladder.
The crux of my indecsion is my gross lack of experience. I would love to try a BP/W, even in a pool. If I go BP/W, I'll probably go with Golem Gear as they have excellent prices and their cost-to-quality value appears good as well.
So, it all comes down to: what is the difference in technique when diving a BP/W versus a BC?
I realize such a broad question will engender much discussion, agreement, and heated debate. Good. I further realize basic questions must be answered:
1. What kind of diving will I do? Recreational, wreck, cave, tech, nekkid,etc? I'm open to all posissibilities, except the last. Texas lakes are far too cold, otherwise...<GRIN>
2. What is my budget? For purposes of this discussion, I'm in the $400 to $600 range. Beyond $600, I may have to put a divorce lawyer on retainer, which would further reduce my dive gear budget.
3. What is my experience? I'm NAUI OW certified with only the 5 certification dives under my belt.
During the pool and OW dives, I used the Zeagle Brigade exclusively; this is a back-inflate. Several folks recommmended it. I prefer back-inflate, so BP/W is a simple transition.
For me, the scope of the debate centers on the convenience of the all-in-one BC with it's integrated weight system, pockets, D-rings versus the BP/W which requires a weight belt and fewer D-rings, and no pockets. The BP/W has less bouyancy than the BC and therefore, requires less weighting. An SS backplate may mean no weight at all, dependent upon whether I'm in freshwater or salt.
A BP/W with a 50-55# lift and STA means I can go doubles or single tank A BC is designed either for a single or a double. The Brigade I used had a 45# Ranger bladder.
The crux of my indecsion is my gross lack of experience. I would love to try a BP/W, even in a pool. If I go BP/W, I'll probably go with Golem Gear as they have excellent prices and their cost-to-quality value appears good as well.
So, it all comes down to: what is the difference in technique when diving a BP/W versus a BC?