What you are saying about PAL seems to be right on the money. Won't fly them again. They ended up doing with our outbound flight was keep the flight number and called it a delay. We thought we were all going to be fighting for a spot on the next flight to MNL. Either way, it was frustrating - goes with the territory, but still painful. We were supposed to have a day in Manila and go to Batangas the next day, but that 10 hour delay ruined that for us.@Kimela
very nice trip report, thank you...
Few things:
1. Philippine Airlines is fine for flights in and around Asia, but across the Pacific I will avoid them at any cost. The planes are older, they are almost always crowded, and the service is average at best.
There are other options... United now flies direct to Manila from SFO. United is significanlty better than PAL. If flying through LAX is a requirement, EVA now flies 3x a day from LAX to TPE, and the flight from TPE to MNL is just about 2 hours, and they also fly this 3x a day (EVA is much better than PAL). This also gives you a chance to get off the plane, walk around for an hour or so in the Taipei Airport (which is nice), then fly to Manila. Basically. I will always try to avoid PAL across the Pacific...
The other thing I often do is spend the day in Manila vs. taking the transfer to Batangas right after getting of the flight.
2. The vis in PG. It's never much better (reagrdless of the moon phase) - the area is not known for great vis, because all that stuff in the water is what makes the life so abundant. If you want great vis in the Philippines you need to try places like Tubbataha (which can only be dived by liveaboard - but vis is great). The trade off is you don't get the diversity of critters.
3. On the delay in LAX: PAL gets their planes serviced in MNL. If something needs work in LAX it's a much bigger hassle for them. PAL flies that route twice a day (different planes, departing ~6 hours apart). There is a chance you were delayed by ~10 hours because your plane was swapped out for the next one, and it was going to take them ~4 hours to turn it around after landing (~6 hours before your eventual departure).
They could have done this for a couple of reasons:
1. There was a maintenance issue with your plane
2. Between the two flights scheduled, one was only lightly booked. They have cancelled one of the two flights quite often when that is the case. The problem is that in the US if they cancel a flight they owe a credit (meals, potentially a hotel stay,etc.). Eaiser for them to "delay" the flight, vs. cancelling it (in the US). In MNL, they will just cancel it (happens somewhat frequently).
Last - yes the winds across the Pacific (during the northern hemisphere winter and spring) are significant. A two hour flight different is about right. I was on a flight (last year) from HKG to SFO that was over 3 hours faster going east to west than what the pilot said was the typical time flying the same route west to east.
.
We fly American most of the time and want to take advantage of the status we've built up for upgrades, the lounge, etc. When you get used to those things it's hard to not have them as options. Over the years we have chosen hotels in order to get loyalty points so that status has been hard-won (paid for in different ways)! We'll do our best to find an American or affiliate flight if/when we do that region again. But if not, I'll be using your advice, thank you.
The dive guides also said the viz was about average once the moon tides resolved. I just wasn't aware of it going there, so it caught me off guard. As much as possible we prefer to do land based trips - for local culture, the off chance there are troubles with the boat, bad weather, and the occasional drama of being on a boat with a bunch of folks you may not particularly love (that happened to us once - so much drama).