PST 104's vs Worthington 130's

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Let us know what you decide...always interested in hearing the results of searches for tanks and sizing issues.
 
hey jim i have 2 sets of 130's next time your down you can barrow them or i can bring the spare set when i hed over for some ice diving this year

Other than diving in a wet suit i always dive x8-130's i had pst 130's but i found that they did not trim out as nice as the x8's so i sold them off .We do allot of deep wreck penatrations in the area i like the extra gas reserve . And due to my size they seem to be the best tanks (6.6ft 255)
 
Hey Jean, thanks for the offer. I'm about 95% sure I'm going to grab those 2 119's since Bob is going to be putting a fresh hydro on them before I pick them up. But I'd definetly like to try your 130's sometime, since we all know I'll end up with a second set eventually anyway.
 
The newer 3442psi worthington's are slightly heavier (about a pound more negative each). They trim out the same. The older 7/8" valve 3500psi tanks are fine except: 1) they are a bear to tumble through the tiny neck 2) the genesis manifolds almost all have a funky angled outlet which creates suboptimal hose routing.

I have older Asahi/Genesis HP100s (as singles). They are noticeably more negative than the current Worthington HP100s (at least a few pounds). Personally, I wouldn't want to double them up, but I do know people who dive them like that, and other than the funky manifold, no real complaints.
 

Back
Top Bottom