Proposed LNG facility in Boston Harbor Islands Nat'l Park

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Last month Save the Harbor / Save the Bay and more than two dozen environmental, advocacy, marine trade and business groups including Boston Harbor Diving Company, City Water Taxi, Surfrider Foundation, The Sierra Club, Mass Audubon, The Environmental League of Massachusetts, Mass PIRG, the Massachusetts Marine Trades Association, the Massachusetts Boating and Yacht Clubs Association and the Massachusetts Lobsterman’s Association, announced their joint opposition to legislation introduced on behalf of the Virginia based AES Corporation to lease Outer Brewster Island in the Boston Harbor Islands National Park and turn it into the largest LNG facility and storage depot in the nation.

A copy of that statement and a complete list of the organizations involved are available on line for your review at http://www.savetheharbor.org

Outer Brewster and the fragile cluster of surrounding islands that make up Calf Bay and Brewster Cove are a spectacular natural and recreational resource, with stunning and historic views of Graves and Boston Light, the seaward gateway to the Boston Harbor Islands and the Harbor itself.

These outer islands and shallow bays are among the most popular recreational waters in the park with great fishing, sailing, birding, diving and boating.

The proposed LNG plant and the security zone that it would likely require would forever restrict access to this important part of the Boston Harbor Islands National Park to recreational boaters, fisherman, lobsterman and sailors, as well as the kayakers and canoeists who consider these protected bays the jewels of the park.

Save the Harbor/Save the Bay is a non-profit, public interest environmental advocacy organization made up of citizens, scientists, civic, corporate, cultural and community leaders whose mission is to restore and protect Boston Harbor and Massachusetts Bay, and keep them clean forever for everyone to enjoy.

We hope members of the diving community will join us in opposing the AES legislation to convert Outer Brewster Island into the nation’s largest LNG Terminal.

If you have questions, want more information, or would like to be added to the list of "opposed individuals" and kept up to date on all new developments on this issue, please contact Lauren Thirer at 617-451-2860 ext. 103, or by email to thirer@savetheharbor.org.

Thanks for your support!
 
I agree it should be moved for the reasons stated. I also agree it should not be moved to the islands considering the environmental/recreational impact.

--Matt
 
I participated in the preparation of an EIS (Env Impact Statement) for an LNG terminal that was slated for construction on the TX gulf coast.

There were a number of issues related to impacts to marine nursery stocks due to the thermal pollution (sea water was used to re-gasify the LNG) and the 30-year dredging requirements associated with the project.

Altho developers tried to sell this as a 'green' energy project, the potential for long-term environmental damages was deemed significant and the project was shelved.
 
i have mixed feelings about it...
Its something that has to go somewhere. but no one wants it in there area...
not that i wanna it happen in the harbor area myself .. it has to go somewhere..
i think all the people that dont want it should propose othere options to back up there arguement....what else to do with it.....
just a idea
 
Diesel298:
i have mixed feelings about it...
Its something that has to go somewhere. but no one wants it in there area...
not that i wanna it happen in the harbor area myself .. it has to go somewhere..
i think all the people that dont want it should propose othere options to back up there arguement....what else to do with it.....
just a idea
FYI - there are currently ten other proposals up and down the coast (from Long Island sound to the Canadian Maritimes) for LNG facilities, so it's not as if this one proposal on Outer Brewster Island is the ONLY option available to increase the region's natural gas supply. (For more info on this, you can visit the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission website - www.ferc.gov - they are the ones who permit the facilities).

Part of the problem is, right now each proposal is looked at individually, instead of anyone taking a look at the region's energy needs and taking a comprehensive look at all of the proposals. In terms of "proposing other options", we are supporting the Massachusetts legislature who has proposed a study commission to help us understand the region’s needs and develop a more comprehensive approach to this issue.
 
I kinda agree with diesel, saying that everyone has been crying about the high price of natural gas and other patroleum products, but when someone proposes putting in a refinery or lng facility its always the nimby(not in my back yard) mentality.
 
well mabye if a bunch of the groups could get together and work with them... rather than aganst them.
they where proposing on in Fal Rsiver as well i dont know what came of it. i havent followed it as closley as i mabye should..
but offshore for security reasons is the way to go..
in populated areas. is not...
im not taking a side, just that it might be more constructive to work with them rather than be the "enviornmental nut job" that is often potrayed.
in any case..
good luck i do hope thigs work out for the best
 
LNG terminals represent the near future in helping meet energy needs. We gotta get more put in, somewhere. Although sticking it in an established park wouldn't be my first choice.:11:

I hope the local stakeholders for that area get their voices heard. The current political climate is not very favorable towards environmental protection, making it an easy target.
 
Call me a nimby-ite, but I'm against it for selfish reasons. I enjoy diving there and it would be forever altered if you put a huge LNG facility there. No matter how "green" the project claimed to be. It would probably also ruin the nice view of those islands and the lighthouse you get from Fort Revere. Who says we 'need' a new LNG facility anyhow? What about updating the exisiting facilities in East Boston/Mystic River area(at least I think it's there)? I'm not trying to be an *** about it, just would like to know who says we 'need' new LNG facility. Of course, when my natural gas runs out this winter, I'll be screaming for a new one!

LobstaMan
 

Back
Top Bottom