Thank you, this is a great point. Anyone who tries to argue that you are more likely to die from a dog/car/coconuts/vending machines than shark attacks are usually bias or forgot what they learned in their intro to statistics class. Before we use statistics to argue that you are more likely to die from other events than shark attacks, we need to establish the sample sizes of said events (which no one seems to offer when discussing this). Consider that 100 people come into close contact with sharks in one year and 1000000000 people come into close contact with dogs/cars/coconuts/vending machines in one year. If we consider further that 10 of people died from shark attacks over the year and 10000000 people were killed by a dog/car/coconuts/vending machines, then 10% of the people died from sharks and 1% of people died from dogs/cars.