I've done LOBs in the Caribbean, Mexican west coast, Indo, and S. Pacific. I've never been on one that didn't have multiple, easy, unobstructed access points to/from below deck areas to different areas of the ship. They have all had individual cabin/stateroom sleeping quarters and a relatively moderate number of divers for the size of the vessel. They all had a night watch. My point is not all LOBs are the same. It's certainly an individuals right not to partake in the LOB experience, but IMHO it's a mistake to paint all LOBs with the same broad brush based on the Conception. I've enjoyed some of my best diving and certainly best diving experiences (comradery, scenery, beautiful night skies, etc.) aboard LOBs. I hope to enjoy more in the future. While I rarely travel with a camera anymore, I will pay closer attention to charging facilities and policies. Diving, the ocean, boats, and life can all be hazardous. I've found it's best to research, educate, and perform a bit of personal risk analysis before climbing aboard. All IMHO, YMMV.
i agree with your comments. I’ve done liveaboards and will continue to do so. But I would never sleep in quarters where I couldn’t exit easily in case of fire (or sinking!) It’s interesting that we as divers will carefully plan our dives but are oblivious to onboard risks. We’ll do a wreck penetration with lights, redundant gas, reels with exit guide lines, carefully study entrance and exit points, etc. make sure we’re fully alert, no alcohol. Yet on board we’ll feel entitled to stay late at the bar and crash below deck with little or no concern for emergency exits. also, I’m a photographer and dive with photographers. I have never seen an issue with battery recharging by photographers either on land or sea. Did the investigators conclude that the fire was started by batteries? Or was it inconclusive, and could have been started by cigarettes, cooking or other source?