Since I know you will try to slam me I will back up my claim:
"Statistically significant" is not the same as "scientifically important". Before interpreting the P value or confidence interval, you/one should think about the size of the treatment effect you are looking for. How large a difference would you consider to be scientifically important? How small a difference would you consider to be scientifically trivial? As a professional you need to use scientific judgment and common sense to answer these questions. Statistical calculations cannot help, as the answers depend on the context of the experiment and the sample size.
Accepting the null hypothesis when the P<.05 or P>.05 if fine as long as the sample size is large enough, or unless the the expireiment is designed as to skew the data... IMHO I think it is not reposonsible to site "evidence" the way you did, when we both know that the sample size was just too small in this case. It happens all the time in print media, no fault of yours, but if you are going to slam a new guy with such weak evidence, and not expect to get called on it----well we dont live in such a society my friend.
Respectfully yours
JPB
"Statistically significant" is not the same as "scientifically important". Before interpreting the P value or confidence interval, you/one should think about the size of the treatment effect you are looking for. How large a difference would you consider to be scientifically important? How small a difference would you consider to be scientifically trivial? As a professional you need to use scientific judgment and common sense to answer these questions. Statistical calculations cannot help, as the answers depend on the context of the experiment and the sample size.
Accepting the null hypothesis when the P<.05 or P>.05 if fine as long as the sample size is large enough, or unless the the expireiment is designed as to skew the data... IMHO I think it is not reposonsible to site "evidence" the way you did, when we both know that the sample size was just too small in this case. It happens all the time in print media, no fault of yours, but if you are going to slam a new guy with such weak evidence, and not expect to get called on it----well we dont live in such a society my friend.
Respectfully yours
JPB