Shasta_man
Contributor
I didn't respond to your PM as it's appropriate here.
You weren't a victim of misinterpretation or reading between the lines. I just went by what you wrote. Whether anyone else complained about your statement is irrelevant.
If you say "Shastaman was in a car crash today" and then "People shouldn't drunk drive and if I'm drunk driving, you should stop me" then it's clear your second statement was due to your thoughts on the car crash. Otherwise you wouldn't say those things together. That's no leap of interpretation to think that. If that wasn't your intent, then great, but it's how you wrote it, and why I suggested rephrase if you didn't mean that. Not the end of the world here, I just thought we don't have the facts to make such a diagnosis and would be unfair to suggest that.
You weren't a victim of misinterpretation or reading between the lines. I just went by what you wrote. Whether anyone else complained about your statement is irrelevant.
If you say "Shastaman was in a car crash today" and then "People shouldn't drunk drive and if I'm drunk driving, you should stop me" then it's clear your second statement was due to your thoughts on the car crash. Otherwise you wouldn't say those things together. That's no leap of interpretation to think that. If that wasn't your intent, then great, but it's how you wrote it, and why I suggested rephrase if you didn't mean that. Not the end of the world here, I just thought we don't have the facts to make such a diagnosis and would be unfair to suggest that.