diverrick
Contributor
I recently picked up a pair of used regulators, and had both overhauled at two different LDS's. I was struck with a thought about this maintenance, and I wanted ask about it here, but I must explain something first, before I ask the question.
I am an Aircraft Technician/Inspector. In that industry, there are certain rules, based on previous disasters, that must be followed to prevent accidents, and deaths. One of these is that one Technician is not supposed to work on both engines at the same time. It is preferred that two different Technicians work on separate engines, on the premise that if Tech #1 makes a mistake, that he won't do it on the other engines as well. This was based on an incident some years ago where a Person worked on both engines of a aircraft (might've been three engines) but.. he accidentally did the job incorrectly, on all the engines, and while in flight, the engines stated failing, until there were no more engines to operate
FAA imposed this rule after this incident from what I have been told.
Now... When I took in the regulators, the same tech overhauled both regs, and the primary. If both secondarys are the same, and he overhauled both incorrectly, doesn't that inject some amount of possable error that could kill you down the road, while diving? It would seen more prudent to have the regs serviced alternately, or by two different techs, to prevent this kind of error. Like the aircraft engines, they ran fine on the ground after maintenance, it took a while, but they did eventually fail. I would think the same thing could happen with Regulators.
I am an Aircraft Technician/Inspector. In that industry, there are certain rules, based on previous disasters, that must be followed to prevent accidents, and deaths. One of these is that one Technician is not supposed to work on both engines at the same time. It is preferred that two different Technicians work on separate engines, on the premise that if Tech #1 makes a mistake, that he won't do it on the other engines as well. This was based on an incident some years ago where a Person worked on both engines of a aircraft (might've been three engines) but.. he accidentally did the job incorrectly, on all the engines, and while in flight, the engines stated failing, until there were no more engines to operate
FAA imposed this rule after this incident from what I have been told.
Now... When I took in the regulators, the same tech overhauled both regs, and the primary. If both secondarys are the same, and he overhauled both incorrectly, doesn't that inject some amount of possable error that could kill you down the road, while diving? It would seen more prudent to have the regs serviced alternately, or by two different techs, to prevent this kind of error. Like the aircraft engines, they ran fine on the ground after maintenance, it took a while, but they did eventually fail. I would think the same thing could happen with Regulators.