Your point is you can go faster with less drag? Fine.
My point is you can go fast enough with a "normal" snorkel.
My point is you can go fast enough with a "normal" snorkel.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I agree, the mask/snorkel/fins are much easier. That is why I prefer the OW student do the 200m swim.My vote is to use a snorkel, mask and fins. I can easily go 500-1000 meters with that configuration but I struggle to get 200 meters without gear. Just my personal preference. Maybe I prefer it because my twice a week workout is swimming laps with snorkel, mask and fins.
I think you're talking about it taking longer to do the 183m/200 yard (or the 300, etc.) if you have a smaller pool as opposed to open water or a large one. This is something the DM course tests should consider (especially on the 100 yd. tired diver tow) when assigning points for various times.Well, clearly, unless you have access to a 183+ metre body of water, you can't do a). Specifically, the continuous bit. With turns and push-offs it's gotta be the 300 in snorkelling kit. And you're going to be there forever: if you ever tried going faster than disabled-snail-on-ketamine pace with the regular (on the side) snorkel, you know why.
I think you're talking about it taking longer to do the 183m/200 yard (or the 300, etc.) if you have a smaller pool as opposed to open water or a large one. This is something the DM course tests should consider (especially on the 100 yd. tired diver tow) when assigning points for various times.