OP
Scott A McWilliam
Contributor
This link will take you to a National Post article on the discovery of a broken Avro Arrow model that has been located on the bottom of Lake Ontario.
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada...box=1602170364
This is an interesting story but what happened with it is very interesting. It was posted on one of the Canadian Archaeological Association social web pages with the title "Yes." Underwater archaeology has a widening rift with main stream archaeology. My response:
No! (with the greatest possible respect.)
Just for a second think of this as a terrestrial archaeological site. . . .
It reads:
“The tale of the sunken treasure hidden somewhere in one of Canada’s great lakes was alluring to John Burzynski, the president and chief executive officer at Osisko Mining Inc., a Canadian mining company. Burzynski was inspired by the discoveries in 2014 and 2016 of the two ships involved in the 19th century Franklin Expedition, during which British Captain Sir John Franklin and his crew of 129 men were lost in the Northwest Passage, in Canada’s Arctic.”
Following an incredibly bad example of maritime museum archaeology by Parks Canada archaeologists, a self-described non-archaeologist treasure hunter, with deep pockets decides to engage in museum archaeology. How is that a good thing?
Also, as stated:
“The test vehicle was put on display at the Canadian Aviation and Space Museum in Ottawa in 2019, but Burzynski wasn’t done.”
They used to keep a lot of artifacts at the National Museum of Brazil and it seemed like a good idea to have a localized repository for that nation’s cultural heritage, until it burned to the ground September 2, 2018.
Of course, that type of thing could never happen here. Unless you count the February 15, 1993 hanger fire at the Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum.
The museums are insured and so are the artifacts. This establishes a minimum cash value for this type of artifact. How many more Burzynski’s are going to be inspired by this? After all, if you find one that is intact it must be worth more than this find. Then what happens? What is the next one worth to a private collector? If you find one that is intact there is only so much display space so, do Mr Burzynski’s finds go into storage, or does he get to take them home?
The part of the story that is not being told is what a remarkable economical price you can buy an archaeologist for in Ontario. It is reminiscent of the Florida treasure hunting ventures in the 70’s. If you have enough money, there is always an under or unemployed archaeologist around to make your treasure hunting dreams come true for a couple of bucks. Who cares about professional ethics or standards, the rent is due on the first of the month?
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada...box=1602170364
This is an interesting story but what happened with it is very interesting. It was posted on one of the Canadian Archaeological Association social web pages with the title "Yes." Underwater archaeology has a widening rift with main stream archaeology. My response:
No! (with the greatest possible respect.)
Just for a second think of this as a terrestrial archaeological site. . . .
It reads:
“The tale of the sunken treasure hidden somewhere in one of Canada’s great lakes was alluring to John Burzynski, the president and chief executive officer at Osisko Mining Inc., a Canadian mining company. Burzynski was inspired by the discoveries in 2014 and 2016 of the two ships involved in the 19th century Franklin Expedition, during which British Captain Sir John Franklin and his crew of 129 men were lost in the Northwest Passage, in Canada’s Arctic.”
Following an incredibly bad example of maritime museum archaeology by Parks Canada archaeologists, a self-described non-archaeologist treasure hunter, with deep pockets decides to engage in museum archaeology. How is that a good thing?
Also, as stated:
“The test vehicle was put on display at the Canadian Aviation and Space Museum in Ottawa in 2019, but Burzynski wasn’t done.”
They used to keep a lot of artifacts at the National Museum of Brazil and it seemed like a good idea to have a localized repository for that nation’s cultural heritage, until it burned to the ground September 2, 2018.
Of course, that type of thing could never happen here. Unless you count the February 15, 1993 hanger fire at the Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum.
The museums are insured and so are the artifacts. This establishes a minimum cash value for this type of artifact. How many more Burzynski’s are going to be inspired by this? After all, if you find one that is intact it must be worth more than this find. Then what happens? What is the next one worth to a private collector? If you find one that is intact there is only so much display space so, do Mr Burzynski’s finds go into storage, or does he get to take them home?
The part of the story that is not being told is what a remarkable economical price you can buy an archaeologist for in Ontario. It is reminiscent of the Florida treasure hunting ventures in the 70’s. If you have enough money, there is always an under or unemployed archaeologist around to make your treasure hunting dreams come true for a couple of bucks. Who cares about professional ethics or standards, the rent is due on the first of the month?