on civility and the reckless diver ...

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

MXGratefulDiver

Mental toss flycoon
ScubaBoard Supporter
Scuba Instructor
Messages
98,858
Reaction score
101,131
Location
On the Fun Side of Trump's Wall
# of dives
2500 - 4999
I'm splitting this from a previous thread, because it deserves its own discussion ...

My point was that to some extent I believe that incivility on SB and elsewhere may result from divers who insist upon their right to dive recklessly and with disregard for safe operating procedures. I think when divers who consider themselves to be responsible run across a diver who is acting irresponsibly, there is a possibility that insults and uncivil discourse may follow.

Diving is a self-policing activity, and there is no scuba court. When people run up against divers who are disrespectful and reckless, response options are limited. I'm suggesting that this is where some of the insults come from.

My observation is that IMO there are divers out there who make very little if any attempt to improve either their skills or their chances of survival. Thus, they exhibit sub-par skills and abilities. I've met a few like this. Furthermore, they don't particularly care that this is the case. And they resent any suggestions, gentle or otherwise, that improvement might be prudent.

If it were only themselves at risk, everyone has a right to kill themselves in any manner they choose. But these divers put other people at risk with their attitudes.

While I am not going so far as to suggest that they deserve to be insulted, here or anywhere, I am stating that IMO they represent a danger to themselves and others. You are well qualified to recognize how quickly any given dive can turn from benign into a sudden nightmare. It is annoying that in many cases careless divers who do not recognize this fact can produce the most horrendous circumstances - and even if they survive the episode, they leave chaos in their wake. While insulting them may not make them safer, they certainly might benefit from an attitude adjustment.

And in no cases should any diver knowingly dive with someone who doesn't care enought about their own safety or their buddy's to dive with a safe attitude.

Because it can be a very serious sport.

Doc

I think there are several good points here ... but also some things I disagree with.

First off, incivility isn't the way to respond to these divers. Because as soon as you do that, they stop listening to anything constructive you have to say.

Secondly, not every diver who is approached in an uncivil manner is being deliberately reckless. Sometimes these people are inadequately trained, and acting out of ignorance. Other times they know they screwed the pooch long before you ever talk to them. So a more constructive approach is not only deserved, but will yield better results.

For example, many on this board have heard me talking about violations of the boundary line at one of our local dive sites. These violations not only put the diver at risk due to the fact that it defines the lane used by the local water taxi, and puts them within easy casting range of the people who use the nearby fishing pier, but it jeopardizes the access of this site to all divers.

As one of the self-appointed "scuba police" ... by virtue of the fact that I help maintain this dive site, and am there frequently ... I get to talk to many of the divers who engage in these violations. They generally fall into two categories ... the new divers who haven't figured out underwater navigation yet, and the very experienced divers who either don't think it's an issue or just plain screwed up.

The former didn't know they were doing anything wrong, the latter knew, and either don't care or simply made a mistake.

In all cases, approaching these people in ways that are insulting or confrontational is counterproductive ... it often just makes them think the person approaching them is a jerk, and they neither listen nor learn anything.

Approaching them in a calm, constructive manner often does achieve the desired result, which is to get them to recognize the problem and buy into making an effort to not do it again.

Most people who dive screw up ... sometimes even deliberately. But you're far more likely to get positive results if you maintain a modicum of civility when discussing the issues with them.

That applies equally to posts on ScubaBoard. I often see people asking questions that, to them, are innocently or sincerely posed. But because of the context of the question, I just cringe ... because I know they are going to get flamed. And they do.

Often these are new members ... who either don't know the personalities on this board, or the history involved in the question they are asking ... and they get flamed and/or insulted not because they are careless divers, but because they lack the context of having been on the board for a long period of time. Or because, as new divers, they simply lack the knowledge to know that what they are asking is absurd or dangerous. And so rather than get educated, they just get insulted.

It's so unnecessary ... and really does these people a disservice, because as soon as the insults begin there is little to no chance these people will actually learn anything. Often, rather than asking questions that will help them learn, they just stop posting ... after all, who needs the abuse?

And for that reason, I disagree with your premise. Incivility is rarely called for with these kinds of divers ... only as a last resort, if even then. By insulting people, all you are really doing is reducing your own credibility in their eyes.

Far better to maintain a level of civility that engenders their respect for your experience and knowledge. Otherwise, as is the case with many experienced divers, people simply label you as an unsavory character and don't listen to anything you have to say.

Keep in mind, respect is a two-way street. And if your intent is to somehow get a message across to those you feel are being careless or irresponsible ... people who you'd like to see become more serious about their diving ... then you first have to gain enough respect from them to cause them to want to hear what you have to say.

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
 
I'm sorry but I think you missed Doc's point. He's not suggesting that insulting people is the way to go. In fact, he specifically said,
Doc Intrepid:
While I am not going so far as to suggest that they deserve to be insulted, here or anywhere,
I believe his point was that the insults and incivility are often the result of frustration on the part of someone trying to help and doing so in a civil manner.

I, for one, have lost count of the number of times I've seen people get smacked around by someone for suggesting something that is DIR in a general context. For example, someone will ask a question about which BC to buy. Someone will reply "have you considered a BP/Wing?" at which point someone else will reply "there is a DIR forum, if he wanted to know about that he would have posted in that forum!" How many times have you seen the pony bottle debate go south? What about the long hose argument? It doesn't take long before you become tired of these exchanges and your replies become curt.

Doc isn't justifying uncivil behavior, he's just offering a suggestion as to why it occurs.
 
Oh, I understand ... and I'm telling you why it shouldn't occur.

I completely agree it goes in all directions ... I'm one of the BP/wing junkies too, ya know ... :D

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
 
NWGratefulDiver:
Oh, I understand ... and I'm telling you why it shouldn't occur.
I try really hard not to get caught up in these things. I just don't think it's worth it. If someone is going to flame someone they're going to do it. It doesn't really matter what you, I or anyone else says. I've gotten into some nasty arguments when I felt strongly about something and I've come away looking just as bad as the other guy.

The only thing I've found that actually makes a difference is ignoring everything and being the one with the cool head. Several times I've tried to give detailed explaintions in the middle of heated argument. I've sent pms to people asking them cool it. Other times I've sent PMs to the poor sap getting beaten up to let them know there is still good information here if they learn to tune ot the hotheads. Getting worked up over it just isn't worth it.


NWGratefulDiver:
I completely agree it goes in all directions ... I'm one of the BP/wing junkies too, ya know ... :D
And you've had a sip of koolaid, if I recall correctly... ;)
 
your both right and you both have very good approaches to teaching if only others could think in the same intelligent thoughtful way.you both have some very valid points.
NWGratefulDiver:
I'm splitting this from a previous thread, because it deserves its own discussion ...



I think there are several good points here ... but also some things I disagree with.

First off, incivility isn't the way to respond to these divers. Because as soon as you do that, they stop listening to anything constructive you have to say.

Secondly, not every diver who is approached in an uncivil manner is being deliberately reckless. Sometimes these people are inadequately trained, and acting out of ignorance. Other times they know they screwed the pooch long before you ever talk to them. So a more constructive approach is not only deserved, but will yield better results.

For example, many on this board have heard me talking about violations of the boundary line at one of our local dive sites. These violations not only put the diver at risk due to the fact that it defines the lane used by the local water taxi, and puts them within easy casting range of the people who use the nearby fishing pier, but it jeopardizes the access of this site to all divers.

As one of the self-appointed "scuba police" ... by virtue of the fact that I help maintain this dive site, and am there frequently ... I get to talk to many of the divers who engage in these violations. They generally fall into two categories ... the new divers who haven't figured out underwater navigation yet, and the very experienced divers who either don't think it's an issue or just plain screwed up.

The former didn't know they were doing anything wrong, the latter knew, and either don't care or simply made a mistake.

In all cases, approaching these people in ways that are insulting or confrontational is counterproductive ... it often just makes them think the person approaching them is a jerk, and they neither listen nor learn anything.

Approaching them in a calm, constructive manner often does achieve the desired result, which is to get them to recognize the problem and buy into making an effort to not do it again.

Most people who dive screw up ... sometimes even deliberately. But you're far more likely to get positive results if you maintain a modicum of civility when discussing the issues with them.

That applies equally to posts on ScubaBoard. I often see people asking questions that, to them, are innocently or sincerely posed. But because of the context of the question, I just cringe ... because I know they are going to get flamed. And they do.

Often these are new members ... who either don't know the personalities on this board, or the history involved in the question they are asking ... and they get flamed and/or insulted not because they are careless divers, but because they lack the context of having been on the board for a long period of time. Or because, as new divers, they simply lack the knowledge to know that what they are asking is absurd or dangerous. And so rather than get educated, they just get insulted.

It's so unnecessary ... and really does these people a disservice, because as soon as the insults begin there is little to no chance these people will actually learn anything. Often, rather than asking questions that will help them learn, they just stop posting ... after all, who needs the abuse?

And for that reason, I disagree with your premise. Incivility is rarely called for with these kinds of divers ... only as a last resort, if even then. By insulting people, all you are really doing is reducing your own credibility in their eyes.

Far better to maintain a level of civility that engenders their respect for your experience and knowledge. Otherwise, as is the case with many experienced divers, people simply label you as an unsavory character and don't listen to anything you have to say.

Keep in mind, respect is a two-way street. And if your intent is to somehow get a message across to those you feel are being careless or irresponsible ... people who you'd like to see become more serious about their diving ... then you first have to gain enough respect from them to cause them to want to hear what you have to say.

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
 
It seems to me that much of the trouble comes from a few people who seem to think they have a right to dictate to other people how to dive.

Each of us has to right to choose how WE want to dive. We also have to right to choose who we will and who we will not dive with.

We do NOT have the right to dictate how anyone else dives, even if they are doing things that we think are dangerous.

I have little tollerance for 'true believers' no matter what dogma they are pushing.
 
Just a thought. I realize some flaming is going to happen. While I don't like it and think it's childish, it happens.

To that end, I also realize flaming is not supposed to happen on the board. I would like to suggest the board make a couple of changes.

1. Zero tolerance policy on flaming in the Introductions and Greetings forum.

2. Create a forum called Flame Throwers. That way, those who absolutely must flame, can go there and do so without putting the rest of us through pain of reading their diatribe.

Brian
 
brianwl:
2. Create a forum called Flame Throwers. That way, those who absolutely must flame, can go there and do so without putting the rest of us through pain of reading their diatribe.

One already exists ... it's called rec.scuba ...

Personally, I'd prefer to keep this an educational forum ... one where people can come to ask questions and learn. The flame-throwers don't contribute anything positive, all they do is mess the place up.

I'd prefer to just see the flame-throwers just go play in somebody else's sandbox ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
 
NWGratefulDiver:
One already exists ... it's called rec.scuba ...

Personally, I'd prefer to keep this an educational forum ... one where people can come to ask questions and learn. The flame-throwers don't contribute anything positive, all they do is mess the place up.

I'd prefer to just see the flame-throwers just go play in somebody else's sandbox ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
Agreed. I was looking for middle ground.

Brian
 
pipedope:
It seems to me that much of the trouble comes from a few people who seem to think they have a right to dictate to other people how to dive.

I don't think I've seen many examples of any one dictating to any one else here. Do you have some links?
I have little tollerance for 'true believers' no matter what dogma they are pushing.

Often ones experience leads them to strongly believe something. If we aren't going to share those experiences and beliefes and even debate them what's the point of even having a board like this?

And BTW the "every one is ok no matter what they do and it's all good" or "no dogma" is just as much "a dogma" as any other. The key phrase there was "little tollerance".

Of course no one should be mistreated and all people deserve to be treated with respect. I don't see that as being true for their ideas though.
 
Back
Top Bottom