Ed,
You have just moved this discussion from the other thread to here.
How do you discount the (conservative est. 100,000) nitrox fills conducted in actual real life cases without any "reported" (we'll play in your park) incidents? I am sure that this is a lot more than the Navy or NASA has conducted. Not that I question NASA on their reasoning. Like I said earlier, I would want the toilet paper O2 cleaned if I was in the Space Shuttle, Lord knows we don't need any more accidents happening to our astronauts.
Next, now think about this. If you have to O2 clean your regs for anything above 25% (regular ole air basically), why would you not have to O2 clean your BC or drysuit, seems to me, (and I am a logical man) that there would be hundreds times more contaminants running around inside of these that would cause a problem. I asked you this before and you haven't answered them yet.
IMHO this rates right up there with red dye #2, I haven't quit eating red hot dogs, but I did give up on laboratory rats.
Don