Invader
Contributor
Didn't see a thread for this.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
The diluent was likely emptied by the diver trying to flush the loop or the loop volume crashing due to extremely high respirations firing the ADV. It's a consequence of the CO2 breakthrough, not a cause.In aviation there is a type of accident there one failure does not lead to an accident there could be 3 ,4 or more failures might occur without the plane coming down. the model is called a swiss cheese model of accidents. The issue comes up when all those holes come into alignment and then you have a failure. I am not versed with CCR but empty dilutent and not making up the balanced canister length are two holes. The third, and this one breaks one heart, is the dive buddy asking if everything was ok before the dive got into the overhead.
The report talks of scrubber 'cartridges'. Is that implying 1) prepacked cartridges, i.e. bought packed or 2) just smaller 'cartridges' that the user / diver packs that then fit inside a larger scrubber cannister?
The make of the rebreather in the case was a meg. Megs are likely the most robust and reliable machine in the industry.The diluent was likely emptied by the diver trying to flush the loop or the loop volume crashing due to extremely high respirations firing the ADV. It's a consequence of the CO2 breakthrough, not a cause.
The fact that the make & model of CCR isn't identified is problematic. It's entirely possible to "design out" the kind of failure this diver experienced. Manufacturer's who fail to do so should be name and shamed instead of putting all the blame here on the diver's assembly mistake.
The Meg, SugGravity Defender, and XCCR all allow for different size (vertical length) scrubbers and corresponding spacers. I went to just using the standard 8# scrubber and appropriate spacer to avoid this potential operator error issue.The fact that the make & model of CCR isn't identified is problematic. It's entirely possible to "design out" the kind of failure this diver experienced. Manufacturer's who fail to do so should be name and shamed instead of putting all the blame here on the diver's assembly mistake.
Hammerhead gave out stickers to put in the canister to indicate proper scrubber height.Personally I think that any scrubber that utilizes a spacer is dangerous since omitting the spacer or using one that is too short will lead to this exact scenario. The simple fact that people want to be able to use different size cans and scrubbers without needing to buy all the necessary components again is the only reason that this is even possible. Having the appropriate spacer built into the bottom of the scrubber is the only solution I can see unless the use of multiple size scrubbers is eliminated. When I had my defender, the first thing I did was use a paint pen to mark the inside of my can so that during assembly it was blindly apparent if I had left the spacer out, even using a check list my "mark" caught my mistake once. Once is all it would have taken to having a report like this one written about me.