This post is about training, not S-drills.
Removing realistic air sharing from courses might be over reacting.
The virus is effectively killed by SOAP. Everyone knows the corona virus is more efficiently killed by soap than by alcohol based disinfectants and that transmission is mostly airborne. There are also procedures that minimize the risk of infection: a backmount cave diver could use the backup reg all the time and offer a clean longhose and a sidemount diver could breathe from one cylinder only and share the other reg during excercise. Wash with soap on the surface.
I am very interested in reading the actual motivation for this policy. Given it's in the U.S. the motivation must be liability. If that is the reason, I might understand the policy (not really). Elsewhere people are responsible for themselves.
[edited: shortened and reorganised the text]
I'm on the NSSCDS training committee that proposed this change and on the NSSCDS board that approved it. However, I'm only speaking for myself.
Let me start off by saying that I'm a firm believer in donate the reg that is in your mouth to an OOG diver. I'm also a firm believer that you need a 7' hose to donate in a cave even if you're diving solo, the person you wind up donating to may not have been part of your original dive team. The *ONLY* time I have ever been in a real OOG scenario while cave diving, the OOG diver was not in my dive team and I'm reasonably sure that he was glad I had a 7' hose.
This change in our training standards is not meant to "get rid of air sharing" drills . When I voted for it, in my mind this is meant to be a temporary change while we are going through a pandemic with a disease that has many unknowns, but is clearly highly infectious, has had a number of people that were asymptomatic spreaders, and has killed many people. In my mind the overriding concern was the safety of the students.
It's my belief that we can effectively simulate an OOG air share without actually breathing from a donated second stage. It is my belief that we can do this in a way that accomplishes the goal of developing the skills to share gas, but without putting someone in potential risk from an asymptomatic spreader.
Also, keep in mind that we first proposed this change in the end of March when the projections were millions of fatalities and we knew less then about SARS-Cov2 than we do today. However, even though social distancing measures have minimized the fatalities, it's my belief that this skill should still continue to be simulated until a vaccine becomes available, or the circumstances of the class allow it to be conducted (husband/wife, students that have titers, etc).
Once the pandemic is over, it's my belief (and hope), that this skill will again become mandatory and required.
In regards to the idea of switching back to breathing the short hose / stuffing the long hose... In the event that I personally were faced with being out of gas and needing gas from a donor, I'll be happy enough to take the second stage that they've been breathing. Yes, I realize that there's still a risk of infection under these circumstances, but that risk is negligible compared to the REAL risk of drowning if I'm OOG.
OK, I realize there are going to be people that disagree with me on this and I'm wearing my asbestos suit.