At a dive shop yesterday and some divers were talking about using nitrox. While this is not a unusal discussion What often comes out of it is a statement of a diver who believes they can and are diving longer becasue they are using nitrox.
As I listened to the discussion I felt the need to clarify something (maybe the need to do this is a ego thing - I don't know-Anyway)
Several of the divers in the discussion believed that they could and were diving longer because they are breathing nitrox. (implied that they are using the same equipment ie size of cylinder by volume)
Now think about this for a moment. While a diver MAY be more relaxed using nitrox and thus their breathing rates improve (no proof to this exists yet) they are not lengthening their dives.
Yes nitrox permits longer dive times, less nitrogen absorbtion equals longer bottom times but it does not lengthen the dive. Your lungs are the same size and will breath at the same rate whether you are on nitrox or air or trimix or whatever you suck back.
The cylinder does not get bigger just because it is now cleaned for O2 use. A 80 cu Ft Al is still 80 cu ft. So with the two mechanical devices (lungs and cylinder) being the same, your breathing rate for the most part being the same it is not likely that you will find your bottom times at depth having a major increase. One should not confuse the allowed times of using nitrox to the breathing times of when using air or nitrox or again whatever you suck back.
With this in mind new divers need to look at why they want to go and take a nitrox class right away. While I am not against them doing so they really need to see if they will benefit from using nitrox. If you have a 1.5 cu ft/min SAC rate then you may want to just wait out on the costlier nitrox gas mix until you get your skills down and the bottom times start to improve. Going on deeper dives where it is possible that you may find your times ending sooner then your air supply and causing you to make an ascent earlier then wanted well then yes nitrox may be the gas of choice (with correct training). BUT if you are diving deeper and your gas management skills are not up there and you do not have the practical application of the gas management knowledge down then you might want to rethink your diving development. Breathing Nitrox does not reduce risks of DCI (too many varibles here thus another myth)
Nitrox while it may allow for longer bottom times DOES NOT translate into an actual increase in bottom times. Not until you can change your lung's volume and SAC rate or increase the amount of gas you carry. With the later having it's own set of issues. Divers should also learn through correct nitrox training that it is at times better to use a mix other then the standard 32 and 36 %, I feel many classes fail to illustrate this point in the practical application of nitrox gas use and management![Popcorn :popcorn: :popcorn:](/community/styles/scubaboard/smilies/popcorn.gif)
As I listened to the discussion I felt the need to clarify something (maybe the need to do this is a ego thing - I don't know-Anyway)
Several of the divers in the discussion believed that they could and were diving longer because they are breathing nitrox. (implied that they are using the same equipment ie size of cylinder by volume)
Now think about this for a moment. While a diver MAY be more relaxed using nitrox and thus their breathing rates improve (no proof to this exists yet) they are not lengthening their dives.
Yes nitrox permits longer dive times, less nitrogen absorbtion equals longer bottom times but it does not lengthen the dive. Your lungs are the same size and will breath at the same rate whether you are on nitrox or air or trimix or whatever you suck back.
The cylinder does not get bigger just because it is now cleaned for O2 use. A 80 cu Ft Al is still 80 cu ft. So with the two mechanical devices (lungs and cylinder) being the same, your breathing rate for the most part being the same it is not likely that you will find your bottom times at depth having a major increase. One should not confuse the allowed times of using nitrox to the breathing times of when using air or nitrox or again whatever you suck back.
With this in mind new divers need to look at why they want to go and take a nitrox class right away. While I am not against them doing so they really need to see if they will benefit from using nitrox. If you have a 1.5 cu ft/min SAC rate then you may want to just wait out on the costlier nitrox gas mix until you get your skills down and the bottom times start to improve. Going on deeper dives where it is possible that you may find your times ending sooner then your air supply and causing you to make an ascent earlier then wanted well then yes nitrox may be the gas of choice (with correct training). BUT if you are diving deeper and your gas management skills are not up there and you do not have the practical application of the gas management knowledge down then you might want to rethink your diving development. Breathing Nitrox does not reduce risks of DCI (too many varibles here thus another myth)
Nitrox while it may allow for longer bottom times DOES NOT translate into an actual increase in bottom times. Not until you can change your lung's volume and SAC rate or increase the amount of gas you carry. With the later having it's own set of issues. Divers should also learn through correct nitrox training that it is at times better to use a mix other then the standard 32 and 36 %, I feel many classes fail to illustrate this point in the practical application of nitrox gas use and management
![Popcorn :popcorn: :popcorn:](/community/styles/scubaboard/smilies/popcorn.gif)