cornfed:Here's an article by Dr. Eddie Brian which addresses some of the why's behind the anectodal claims.
Dr. Brian doesn't make anything more than anecdotal claims regarding the use of Sudafed, notice this statement on
Corfed's Article by Dr. Brian:Although not studied, it is possible that pseudoephedrine may contribute to hyperoxic seizures by elevating brain catecholamines
However before this he details how brain catecholamines vary from body catecholamines, and how sudafed targets the bodies catecholamines.
Now that is alot of $5 words but what I took from it was that it was purely conjecture based upon how pseudophedrine works in the body and what were possible should it ever react in the brain. Notice, however that this was not studied specifically. Dr. Brian does go into some detail in the earlier pages regarding the differences between body and brain catecholamines. This only works to make me question his statement on pseudophedrine though.
The article by Dr. Thalman that Dandy Don has posted for us on the other hand, comes from one of the most prestigious names in diving medicine (DAN) and includes a case-by-case summary of the original incidents that led to the "No pseudofed for Nitrox diving" mentality that we all grew up listening to. In fact detailing out the five criteria for a causal relationship;
Dr Thalman:"Statistical association" means that there is statistical evidence that symptoms that occur when pseudoephedrine is taken in association with certain types of dives are not a random occurrence. Mount did not provide enough information to establish a statistical association.
"Strength of association" means that very frequently, when the drug is taken before a dive, some sort of untoward effect usually occurs during or after the dive: that is, the incidence of effects when pseudoephedrine is take in association with a dive is very high.
Conversely, if no pseudoephedrine is taken, similar types of dives almost never produce side effects. Since we don't know how many individuals take pseudoephedrine before diving with no effects, like those reported above, we can't measure the incidence.
"Timing of association" means that the reported side effects usually occur if the drug is taken before a dive, and not if it is taken afterward. Since only incidents in which the drug was taken before the dive were reported, we can't invoke this criteria.
"Consistency of response" means that the same effect is seen when the drug is taken, although the incidence may be rare. There does not seem to be any consistency in the symptoms reported above.
"Biological plausibility" means that there is some identified mechanism by which the drug could cause an undesirable side effect. In particular, we are interested in whether it may enhance susceptibility to oxygen toxicity. Here, we do have some evidence. In 1962, none other than DAN's Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Peter Bennett, while working as a research physiologist at the Royal Navy Physiological Laboratory in England, published a paper (Life Sciences; 12:721-727, 1962) testing the hypothesis that oxygen toxicity and nitrogen narcosis were caused by similar mechanisms.
But the DAN doc goes one further in his conclusion saying that not only is pseudophedrine fine for air diving, but details his thoughts on EAN diving as well;
Dr. Thalman:...and it seems reasonable to avoid the drug entirely if diving while using oxygen-nitrogen mixes where the PO2 during a dive might exceed 1.4 ata, the current recommended "safe" open-circuit scuba limit.
Now my reason for inquiring is based on the OW class that I have to dive with in a few hours, sinuses giving me all heck yesterday making it nearly impossible to equalize and I'm looking for something to open my head up. I will be well below the 1.4 PO2 limit utilizing EAN36 for these dives, I certainly appreciate everyone posting here and linking articles on the subject. I guess if you don't hear back from me get my computer to Dr. Thalman so he can update his research.