HenrikBP
Contributor
In May I went to Little Cayman for a week stay + diving at Little Cayman Beach Resort (highly recommended). Before the trip I had been debating about bringing a camera and if so which one.
I finally decided to use our above water pocket camera, a Canon SD880, and bought a Canon housing for it. I know it doesn't have RAW, or anything in the way of manual settings. But then I also didn't buy a strobe either. And despite all that, the mostly so-so pictures I got were not the camera's fault
Most of my shots were either "fish butts" or "where's Waldo" style pictures . I.e. fish swimming away or a shot of something that required quite a bit of searching/zooming to find the "subject". But I got a bunch of decent "underwater tourist" pictures and a few that were a bit better. No way near the good stuff I often see posted here, but not too bad either.
There were 2 main causes for these less than stellar shots:
1) my buoyancy and trim control: I'm pretty good when comparing myself to other divers I've seen. But much more is needed for close-up photography. I saw a couple of UW photographers with less regard for the UW environment using sticks or rattlers to support themselves on the reef (saw worse than that actually). But I refused to risk touching anything just to get the shot.
2) white balance: I should have trusted my manual white balance more. But the screen on the SD880 shows the review picture *much* more red than it comes out when viewed on the computer. So for the most part I used the Canon UW setting, which works well to about 20-25' on a sunny day. But with clouds or diving deeper, it gets the blues.
All in all I had fun with the camera. I was mostly diving with a camera rather than diving for the purpose of taking pictures. And for that the little Canon worked out well. The Canon housing was easy to use after a bit of above water practice. And when not taking pictures I clipped the camera to the D-ring on my crotch strap where it was out of the way.
As for other observations - well ...
- it seems that some divers with cameras think that them taking pictures take priority over what I consider proper etiquette UW. For instance, it is apparently ok to risk or actually damage surrounding coral if the subject is sufficiently interesting. It is apparently also ok to touch/lift marine life to get a better angle for the shot.
- it seems that just carrying a camera underwater causes some divers/photographers to think they have first dips on anything interesting. I was pushed and kicked and had my mask kicked off by stampeding "photogs".
- when done monopolizing the subject it is apparently also ok to happily swim away with brisk flutter kicks silting up or plain "flushing" away said subject (tiny pipe horse in a tuft of seaweed).
Now off the soapbox to say. It was fun, but when the members of the board recommend holding off on bringing a camera until you have better control underwater, they're indeed correct.
Here are links to a few of the "better" pictures:
Very cooperative turtle:
http://handm.smugmug.com/photos/565566190_Pw9Ft-L-1.jpg
Needle nose puffer - I think ...
http://handm.smugmug.com/photos/565560020_U8RV6-L-1.jpg
Flamenco tongue nudibranch:
http://handm.smugmug.com/photos/565558353_2Q2qb-L-1.jpg
Grouper and Green Moray hunting team:
http://handm.smugmug.com/photos/565558005_HcPom-L-1.jpg
UW landscape:
http://handm.smugmug.com/photos/565590364_sZcG6-L-1.jpg
All these photos are straight out of the camera with no further editing.
Henrik
I finally decided to use our above water pocket camera, a Canon SD880, and bought a Canon housing for it. I know it doesn't have RAW, or anything in the way of manual settings. But then I also didn't buy a strobe either. And despite all that, the mostly so-so pictures I got were not the camera's fault
Most of my shots were either "fish butts" or "where's Waldo" style pictures . I.e. fish swimming away or a shot of something that required quite a bit of searching/zooming to find the "subject". But I got a bunch of decent "underwater tourist" pictures and a few that were a bit better. No way near the good stuff I often see posted here, but not too bad either.
There were 2 main causes for these less than stellar shots:
1) my buoyancy and trim control: I'm pretty good when comparing myself to other divers I've seen. But much more is needed for close-up photography. I saw a couple of UW photographers with less regard for the UW environment using sticks or rattlers to support themselves on the reef (saw worse than that actually). But I refused to risk touching anything just to get the shot.
2) white balance: I should have trusted my manual white balance more. But the screen on the SD880 shows the review picture *much* more red than it comes out when viewed on the computer. So for the most part I used the Canon UW setting, which works well to about 20-25' on a sunny day. But with clouds or diving deeper, it gets the blues.
All in all I had fun with the camera. I was mostly diving with a camera rather than diving for the purpose of taking pictures. And for that the little Canon worked out well. The Canon housing was easy to use after a bit of above water practice. And when not taking pictures I clipped the camera to the D-ring on my crotch strap where it was out of the way.
As for other observations - well ...
- it seems that some divers with cameras think that them taking pictures take priority over what I consider proper etiquette UW. For instance, it is apparently ok to risk or actually damage surrounding coral if the subject is sufficiently interesting. It is apparently also ok to touch/lift marine life to get a better angle for the shot.
- it seems that just carrying a camera underwater causes some divers/photographers to think they have first dips on anything interesting. I was pushed and kicked and had my mask kicked off by stampeding "photogs".
- when done monopolizing the subject it is apparently also ok to happily swim away with brisk flutter kicks silting up or plain "flushing" away said subject (tiny pipe horse in a tuft of seaweed).
Now off the soapbox to say. It was fun, but when the members of the board recommend holding off on bringing a camera until you have better control underwater, they're indeed correct.
Here are links to a few of the "better" pictures:
Very cooperative turtle:
http://handm.smugmug.com/photos/565566190_Pw9Ft-L-1.jpg
Needle nose puffer - I think ...
http://handm.smugmug.com/photos/565560020_U8RV6-L-1.jpg
Flamenco tongue nudibranch:
http://handm.smugmug.com/photos/565558353_2Q2qb-L-1.jpg
Grouper and Green Moray hunting team:
http://handm.smugmug.com/photos/565558005_HcPom-L-1.jpg
UW landscape:
http://handm.smugmug.com/photos/565590364_sZcG6-L-1.jpg
All these photos are straight out of the camera with no further editing.
Henrik
Last edited: