New TSA directives
- Thread starter Brewski
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
Papa_Bear
Contributor
I like NO UNDERWEAR! What if it is a woman with a Explosives mad to look like a penis? The best way is still the OATH! Or let let the CIA take them out over there before they get in an Airport! 
Belmont
Contributor
They had this guy with explosives in his shoes, we now have to put our shoes trough the x-ray scanner.
Now this last one with detonating powder in his crotch: it results in limitations on cabin baggage, and rest room usage.
What next: a terrorist with explosives up his arse. TSA personnel will be issued two finger rubber gloves.
Now this last one with detonating powder in his crotch: it results in limitations on cabin baggage, and rest room usage.
What next: a terrorist with explosives up his arse. TSA personnel will be issued two finger rubber gloves.
Papa_Bear
Contributor
The airlines is the ones restricting it! They want to make more money checking your stuff! Now if they said the third small bag free, then I could care less if its in the belly of the plane! As I said, let the CIA take care of it! Or make them take the OATH! It is all BS and maybe we need to put cameras in the head, you never know what "They" are doing in the Head?!!!!:shocked2:
We might consider going back to two 70lb bags and then the other 40lbs could end up in the Hold! 
We might consider going back to two 70lb bags and then the other 40lbs could end up in the Hold! 
It is completely out of control.
The Amurikan people need to grow up and understand that total safety is not possible. Every measure has a counter, every counter has a counter measure.
Write and call your congressman and voice your anger at additional infringements or sit there like cattle and mooooooooooo.
If I have to p------ and I cannot go to the head I am just going to start carrying a change of cloths. I think if people are p-----ng all over the airplanes that might change some thinking. Non violent resistance.
Janet said the "system worked" uh huh.
N
The Amurikan people need to grow up and understand that total safety is not possible. Every measure has a counter, every counter has a counter measure.
Write and call your congressman and voice your anger at additional infringements or sit there like cattle and mooooooooooo.
If I have to p------ and I cannot go to the head I am just going to start carrying a change of cloths. I think if people are p-----ng all over the airplanes that might change some thinking. Non violent resistance.
Janet said the "system worked" uh huh.
N
DennisS
Contributor
scubafanatic
Contributor
- Messages
- 5,090
- Reaction score
- 918
...well, I guess us divers, already being used to peeing in our wetsuits, could just wear our wetsuits on the plane, and when nature calls, well.......
We could install pee valves but once you pee into a baggy then you might be over the limit on fluids
. I suppose we could then hand the pee bag to the stewardess . Would a DIR balanced pee valve be better for this
.N
Just plumb up with a condom cath and about 2 feet of 1/4" tubing. Then pee in what ever they served your in flight drinks in and hand it back to the flight attendent.
all window dressing, no real protections will ever happen in the US or US Flagged planes or ships.
Real protection costs MONEY window dressing doesn't.
Berlin disco,Marine barracks,lockerbie, Navy EOD guy thrown on tarmac,world trade center 93,USS Cole, Africa embassies, 9/11 after every one of these window dressing was applied and no real prevention or detection implemented because it costs MONEY or is politically sensitive.
I didn't start the thread so I don't feel too bad in breaking the rules for SB, but let's be honest about the subject or close and delete it.
Real protection costs MONEY window dressing doesn't.
Berlin disco,Marine barracks,lockerbie, Navy EOD guy thrown on tarmac,world trade center 93,USS Cole, Africa embassies, 9/11 after every one of these window dressing was applied and no real prevention or detection implemented because it costs MONEY or is politically sensitive.
I didn't start the thread so I don't feel too bad in breaking the rules for SB, but let's be honest about the subject or close and delete it.
Similar threads
