tribalrites
Guest
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 0
I am going to Cozumel in early March, and while I do not dive very often, every time I go I get the itch to buy a camera setup. I had a chance to rent a point a shoot system a few years back when I took a trip to the Galapagos, and a really loved taking photos and video as well. Unfortunately, I just have not gotten serious about looking into a system until now.
After doing some research I became interested in the S100 with the Ikelite housing. The Recsea would be nice, but I think a bit to pricey sinceI want to add a strobe.
Here is my mental dilemma considering budgetary famly issues:
I have a Canon SD1300 and a Canon 300HS. I figure if I want to go super cheap(relative) just to have fun I could go with a Canon housing for the 1300, or I could go with an Ikelite housing for the 300HS for a little better options in a point and shoot. Plus the 300 takes video in 1080P whereas the 1300 only does 640x480. My issue with these is that at ~$189 and $260 respectively that seems like a lot to spend for something that may or may not have the functionality I would like. I, personally, do not like to spend money twice. In other words, would I be disappointed buying something that just didn't do it for me and coming back from the trip wishing I had taken the plunge and put the 200-300 towards a nicer setup. On the other hand, since I do not dive very often (1 trip a year 2 if I am lucky), is it too much to spend on a nicer system that may sit for awhile in between uses?
Here is what I was thinking for the setup: S100 with Ikelite and the YS-01 Strobe.
I want to save some money in the tray and arm area. Are the Fantasea Blue Ray trays and flex arms OK or should I be looking at somethingbetter? Also, is it worth adding a nice video light as this camera does 1080P. I thought the I-torch Pro 4 would be nice, but is that too muchfor this this system. Could I go cheaper and get the sameresult?
With the Blue Ray trays and arms I priced it out at $1224 add another $400 for the Torch if I buy the set.
I have been diving for maybe ten years or more, but only have about a bit over 100 dives(I wish it were way more). Although, I find I breathe very well and have decent control of my buoyancy every time I go. So using the camera is not at issue.
TIA for any help.
After doing some research I became interested in the S100 with the Ikelite housing. The Recsea would be nice, but I think a bit to pricey sinceI want to add a strobe.
Here is my mental dilemma considering budgetary famly issues:
I have a Canon SD1300 and a Canon 300HS. I figure if I want to go super cheap(relative) just to have fun I could go with a Canon housing for the 1300, or I could go with an Ikelite housing for the 300HS for a little better options in a point and shoot. Plus the 300 takes video in 1080P whereas the 1300 only does 640x480. My issue with these is that at ~$189 and $260 respectively that seems like a lot to spend for something that may or may not have the functionality I would like. I, personally, do not like to spend money twice. In other words, would I be disappointed buying something that just didn't do it for me and coming back from the trip wishing I had taken the plunge and put the 200-300 towards a nicer setup. On the other hand, since I do not dive very often (1 trip a year 2 if I am lucky), is it too much to spend on a nicer system that may sit for awhile in between uses?
Here is what I was thinking for the setup: S100 with Ikelite and the YS-01 Strobe.
I want to save some money in the tray and arm area. Are the Fantasea Blue Ray trays and flex arms OK or should I be looking at somethingbetter? Also, is it worth adding a nice video light as this camera does 1080P. I thought the I-torch Pro 4 would be nice, but is that too muchfor this this system. Could I go cheaper and get the sameresult?
With the Blue Ray trays and arms I priced it out at $1224 add another $400 for the Torch if I buy the set.
I have been diving for maybe ten years or more, but only have about a bit over 100 dives(I wish it were way more). Although, I find I breathe very well and have decent control of my buoyancy every time I go. So using the camera is not at issue.
TIA for any help.