New deco calculator

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Arnvig

Registered
Scuba Instructor
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Location
Denmark
# of dives
500 - 999
I have made a non-nonsense deco calculator

Arnvig.dk - Deco Calculator

Based on Bühlmann ZHL16 algorithm it will calculate deco for any EAN mix using up to 100% oxygen as deco gas and modyfing by gradient factors.

All metrics are in meters

Please post any comment you might have.
 
I'm alittle rusty on the whole meters to feet conversion. Anyway to change it?
 
Nice!

But why the BM a, b and c?

Also, if you can make this into a stand alone app one can load on a computer....

But a very nice and clean way of doing things.
 
Nice!

But why the BM a, b and c?

Also, if you can make this into a stand alone app one can load on a computer....

But a very nice and clean way of doing things.

The BM a,b and c is for you to choose, they dont mean that much difference once you start playing with the GFs, thou.

Stand alone...? Maybe later, the code is quite simple , less than 100 lines, when you dont have to do graphics.

Thanx.
 
Looks Intersting, I'm Looking Into A Few Programs For This. Since I Am Going To Get Into Tech Diving
 
I would suggest to use one and make it easier. I believe that A was the original and purely theoretical and very aggressive. B was adjusted with empirical data (more conservative) and C was specifically adapted to be used in computers.

If you can make it into a small app that just spits out RT tables, you should be golden
 
I would suggest to use one and make it easier. I believe that A was the original and purely theoretical and very aggressive. B was adjusted with empirical data (more conservative) and C was specifically adapted to be used in computers.

If you can make it into a small app that just spits out RT tables, you should be golden

It will default to LZH16B, but you can choose the others for comaprison.
Again, once you start fiddeling with GF, the a-b-c issue is less important.

I will probably convert the whole thing to a small applikation, doing run time and gas consumption tables.
 
Nice calculator. Is there anyway I can download it to have when traveling abroad and don't have access to internet (liveaboards etc}.
 

Back
Top Bottom