Yes, I'm quite sure the PZ+ algorithm will do fine, especially after reading this review
A sense of algorithm
PZ+ is fine, if that's what you want. But, I would put just about zero stock in that review. There is definitely something wrong with their test of the Oceanic computer running DSAT. My guess is that that computer was somehow set with an elevated Conservatism Factor, instead of the default of 0.
Here is another test of computers:
The Best Scuba Diving Computers Reviewed by ScubaLab
The results are here in PDF form:
http://ads.bonniercorp.com/scuba/PDF/ScubaLab-Computer-Test-September-2014-data.pdf
This test shows that the DSAT computer consistently gives longer bottom times than the PZ+ computer - and almost every other computer, for that matter.
Personally, I have over 100 dives on my Oceanic Atom, running DSAT, and it has always performed exactly in line with the ScubaLabs test results and never behaved like that Divernet review suggests. I have 24 dives with it that are over 30m (100'), with a deepest of 48m (160'). I have put it into deco a few times and it has always cleared the deco before my Shearwater Petrel 2 or SeaBear H3 has cleared.
Plus, the Divernet test is all about how these computers handle deco. If you're planning to do deco diving, I would DEFINITELY not buy the Aqualung or any other recreational computer. All of those will tell you in the User Manual that they are not intended for use in decompression diving.
That Divernet test may be useful for how the French teach and dive, but it's not very relevant at all to the way PADI, SDI, SSI, or most any other training that I know of in the U.S. anyway works. OTOH, the ScubaLabs test is directly correlated to recreational diving by PADI, etc., guidelines.
Like I said, PZ+ is fine. But, don't shun the DSAT computers just because of what that Divernet review said. It is effed!
I looked heavily into getting an Aeris A300 CS or Oceanic VTX at one point. The same computer as the i750t (I guess) except for having additional capability (the option for DSAT). I ruled out the A300 CS or VTX for a couple of reasons (based on user comments that I read). One, they had very short battery life. And, two, they were VERY hard to read in any kind of bright sunlight. As in, could even be hard to read during a safety stop, if you're in clear water on a bright, sunny day. I don't know if the AL version has any changes to address those issues, but I would certainly WANT to know about those things before buying one.
Finally, Deep6 is supposed to be releasing their computer very soon. It's supposed to be priced at $140, I think. And, someone (
@LandonL) who I believe works for Deep6 has posted on here last week that they are updating the computer right now so that it will offer an option to use the Buhlmann ZHL-16C algorithm, with Gradient Factors, I think. That sounds like a good computer at a stellar price. And a much better option if you DO want to do dives with some small amount of decompression (as in that Divernet test).
Deep 6 Gear
The computer isn't on their website yet, as it's not released yet. But, you can find some info here on SB if you search around.